Welcome to Democratic Convention Watch

Donate to DCW


Follow DCW on Twitter
Follow DCW on Facebook
2016 Democratic Convention
2016 Republican Convention Charlotte Host Committee
DNCC
2010 Census

Follow DCW on Google+
DCW iPhone App Info
A Guide to DemConWatch
Tags
FAQ
2008 Democratic Primary Links
2008 Democratic National Convention Links
DemConWatch Archives '05-'08
DemConWatch Speeches
Inauguration Information
DCW Store

HOME
Mobile Version




Search


Advanced Search
Contributors:
MattOreo
DocJess

This site is not affiliated with the DNC, DNCC, or any campaign.

Email us at

Blog Roll
Frontloading HQ
The Field
MyDD
Swing State Project
DemNotes
DemRulz

DCW in the News
St. Louis Channel 2 News
AP
Politico
Wall Street Journal
The New York Times
NPR
Wired
US News & World Report

The Neighborhood Kids: Obama and Boehner

by: DocJess

Thu Sep 01, 2011 at 05:57:44 AM EDT


There are a bunch of kids in my neighborhood. They all play together because, well, they're the kids in the neighborhood. There's one bad kid. He's a bully, and he sometimes beats up the other kids. He also performs a certain amount of neighborhood vandalism. The police won't do anything because he's "too young" (which ends next year) and his mother won't do anything. 

I felt like I was watching another version of the neighborhood kids yesterday. The president (aka one of the younger kids in terms of who has power) decided to schedule a speech when the Republicans had scheduled a debate. Boehner, the bully, said no. Politico, playing the role of the police, declined to move the debate. Obama agreed to be bullied, but kept playing because, well, these are the kids in the neighborhood.

Astounding. Admittedly, it's not a direct correlation. But the tone was the same.

While the three branches of government spar over issues and ideology, this is the first time in history that Congress ever said FU to a sitting president who wanted to come down Pennsylvania Avenue and make a speech. It is appalling. And it makes me wonder whether Boehner will not extend an invitation in January for Obama to make his annual State of the Union address. He has to be invited. Again, appalling.

On the flip side, like the kid who never gets to choose what game the neighborhood group will play, Obama should have known better then to ask for the date already picked for a Republican event. And yes, someone in the White House had to know. It wasn't an oversight.

But there is something as important as infighting, more important to most, the issue that Obama wanted to speak on: JOBS. Obama will be speaking in the House, next Thursday, on his new jobs program. And the question is where Obama will start on the football field. The major progressive organizations have sent an open letter asking him to go big. They say:

Jobs
View more documents from DocJess.

Think about the major jobs programs over time: they don't just create jobs, they improve America. Last night, I caught a bit of Rachel, and the woman filling in for her reminded me that Ike's national highway program was not just a jobs program, but a national defense program. (We can talk later about whether putting that much money into roads in lieu of public transport contributed to the current oil usage problem, but that's for another day.) TVA brought electricity to millions. We still use the schools and public buildings constructed under Roosevelt. The list goes on. The sole jobs program the right likes is the one that employs people to build things, and deploy things, that kill people. Is that REALLY the one jobs program you want to survive the schoolyard infighting?

If Obama only goes for what he things he can get, or if he even mentions the deficit, we've lost. And when I say "we" I mean people who work for a living, those who wish they were working, kids who get an education, people who serve the public, like cops, firemen and teachers, you know, "us". 

Remember:

A new study released Wednesday found that 25 of the 100 highest-paid U.S. CEOs actually earned more than their companies paid in federal income taxes last year[...]

Some of the companies on the list benefited by keeping money that would have been taxed in offshore subsidiaries – places such as Bermuda and Luxembourg.

Those include General Electric, whose CEO Jeff Immelt raked in $15.2 million in 2010, while the company earned a $3.3 billion federal refund, and Boeing, which gave top boss Jim McNerney $13.8 million, while shelling out just $13 million in federal taxes.

The kid in my neighborhood who gets beaten up on a regular basis has only one hope. That all of us who stand idly by instead take turns hanging out in small groups, watching the kids, and then intervening. You know where this analogy is going...call your rep and Senators: say "shared sacrifice" and "jobs" and "go big." It may not work. You can see the latest reply I received from my Congressman after the jump. But it's still worth trying. 

DocJess :: The Neighborhood Kids: Obama and Boehner

Thank you for taking the time to contact me regarding the budget deficit.  I appreciate hearing your concerns and for the opportunity to share my thoughts as well. 

Since World War II, the budget deficit is at its highest ever—both in terms of real dollars and as a share of our country's gross domestic product (GDP).  This year alone, the budget deficit is projected to reach $1.6 trillion, which is about 9% of GDP.  If current law remains unchanged, our fiscal policy is on an unsustainable path.  The federal deficit—and the interest on that debt—will outpace our national income. 

The problem is the Federal government is spending more than it's collecting.  Government spending has reached its highest level as a share of GDP since 1945, and the revenues collected to finance this spending has reached their lowest level since 1950.  It is estimated that the taxes collected this year will be less that 15% of the GDP.  The real predicament lies with the growth of mandatory entitlement spending.  Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid roughly account for three-quarters of all spending.  With the retirement of the baby boomers, the rising cost of healthcare, and increasing life expectancy, this percentage is expected to accelerate in the future.  By mid-century, the cost of Social Security and Medicare alone are expected to exceed all total revenues. 

If we are to stave off another fiscal crisis, Congress needs to take immediate steps to reduce the growing deficit in the near-term.  That is why I voted in favor of the Budget Control Act.  It is a small, but important first step in curbing our mounting national debt.  In the long-term, Congress and the Administration will need to enact policy reforms that cut government spending, raise revenue, or a combination of both. 

Raising taxes on the rich alone will not fix the deficit.  A tax increase for the top 2% of U.S. households, as President Obama proposes, will only bring in $34 billion annually.  According to economists, that amount will only "cover nine days' worth of the deficit."  Currently, 51 percent of American households pay no federal income tax.  Of those, 23.8 million low-income tax filers receive approximately $47.5 billion in cash assistance through the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) based on current figures. 

It is vital that Congress moves forward to restore America's financial health and I believe all solutions should be on the table for consideration.  As Congress considers further deficit reduction proposals, I will certainly bear your thoughts in mind. 

Thank you again for contacting me about this important issue.  If I can be of any assistance to you or your family in the future, please do not hesitate to contact me. 

With kind regards, I am


Sincerely,

Jim Gerlach
Member of Congress

By the way, he didn't answer to my points, which were "shared sacrifice" and "raise my taxes", but I keep trying.

Follow Democratic Convention Watch on Facebook and Twitter. Iphone/Android apps available.

Tags: , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

If I were Obama (0.00 / 0)
I would have said FU to Boehner and either addressed the Senate or the people directly.  Still it was odd scheduling, what was someone thinking or were they really that uninformed?

Until outsourcing and H1-Bs are fixed, the economy will never recover.  Yet no one with any power ever mentions that.  I see that the solar company Obama was touting has folded, presumably due to Chinese undercutting their prices although the particular article I read did not say that.

We need tariffs or similar measures to put the US worker on an even footing with workers in other countries who are paid much less, have no benefits, and whose companies send zilch on pollution controls.  This is not rocket science.


I hope you responded to the blatant lies and mis information (0.00 / 0)
 I mean really? where the F@#k did he get this from? it isn't remotely accurate, and S.S. and medicare are paid into via the payroll tax, and up until the payroll tax holidays were fully self funding.
Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid roughly account for three-quarters of all spending

and maybe point out to him that the reason spending is at a high point and taxes are low is because W wasted the Clinton budget surplus, started two wars, cut taxes, and let the economy tank, and I'm sure you can add much more and with better detail.

give him hell


AH Joe!!!!! (0.00 / 0)
You have no idea (ok, you probably do (GRIN)) about the level of detail I express when I write him, when I call his office, and when I interact in any way with him. I wish he'd have a public meeting I could attend....

What can you say about a guy whose wife divorced him based on the fact that all he cared about was his career and not her nor the kids, and then he married a woman with the SAME name so it looks like he didn't get divorced? (Yeah, really.)

Sadly, he's getting a better district in the new redistricting. It looks like he's going from D+4 to R+2 (or something like that) -- I haven't seen the full map, but I heard from a reliable source. It will be trouble for Pat in the 7th, but we'll have a better chance of picking up a seat.


[ Parent ]
Thoughts and reflections (0.00 / 0)
Politics is a game, and it's not a game that is being played real well by the Democratic party right now. Maybe things will shift over the next few months, but the raw hatred for President Obama that the Republicans have is the most divisive I have seen towards a sitting President and that includes 2 Presidents where the opposing party tried to impeach them.

No matter what President Obama puts out, there is little chance to none, that any will be enacted by the current Congress. The Republicans would rather see America fail and go by the wayside than to allow any improvement to the economy by the hand of President Obama.

I'm usually a pretty positive guy, but..........

Okay, what should have been the White Houses response to Speaker Boehner saying that President Obama could not address a joint session on Wednesday? Personally I think the President should have stayed on that date and time and taken all the major networks to address the Nation. Then the Republican Debate would have only been able to have been seen on tape delayed.

Now, I think a speech of this type needs to be to Congress. It should address the problem, lay down guidelines and recommendations that are specific, and put the monkey on the Houses of Congress to get to work to save this great Nation of ours.

Now the good thing about the speech being moved, I work Wednesday night, but have Thursday off so I will be able to watch it live. ;o)


or (0.00 / 0)
the networks might have delayed Obama's speech, who knows nowadays.

[ Parent ]
Moving the date (0.00 / 0)
We are all really backed in to our corners, based on the coverage and discussion of the date move.

The President shouldn't have asked for the same night as the Republican debate in the first place. The Speaker asked him to move it, and he did. Strip away all the rhetoric and spin that accompanied this, and it was the right result.


Actually... (0.00 / 0)
If these people were all adults, LAST week or before he went on vacation, Obama would have spoken to Boehner, they would have picked a date, announced together and both looked good.

I've heard that Obama originally picked Wednesday over Thursday, since Thursday was some football game.



Menu


Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

Make a New Account


Currently 0 user(s) logged on.



Subscribe to Posts

DemConWatch on Twitter
DemConWatch on Facebook


View blog authority

Add to Technorati Favorites

Wikio - Top Blogs - Politics

Who links to my website?

Sign the Petition (A)
Powered by: SoapBlox