Welcome to Democratic Convention Watch

Donate to DCW

Follow DCW on Twitter
Follow DCW on Facebook
2012 Democratic Convention
2012 Republican Convention
2012 GOP Superdelegate List

AP Delegate Count
Romney989
Santorum265
Gingrich130
Paul106
Unallocated58
Needed to Win: 1144

2012 Senate Forecast: 48.9

Charlotte Host Committee
DNCC
2010 Census

Follow DCW on Google+
DCW iPhone App Info
A Guide to DemConWatch
Tags
FAQ
2008 Democratic Primary Links
2008 Democratic National Convention Links
DemConWatch Archives '05-'08
DemConWatch Speeches
Inauguration Information
DCW Store

HOME
Mobile Version




Search


Advanced Search
Contributors:
MattOreo
DocJess

This site is not affiliated with the DNC, DNCC, or any campaign.

Email us at

Blog Roll
Frontloading HQ
The Field
MyDD
Swing State Project
DemNotes
DemRulz

DCW in the News
St. Louis Channel 2 News
AP
Politico
Wall Street Journal
The New York Times
NPR
Wired
US News & World Report

Romney campaign questions delegate tie in Michigan

by: Oreo

Thu Mar 01, 2012 at 19:01:39 PM EST


Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum's campaign on Wednesday claimed a 15-15 delegate tie with rival Mitt Romney the day after Michigan's primary — a claim Romney's camp immediately disputed.

"We tied the state of Michigan," John Yob, adviser for the Santorum campaign, said in a press phone call Wednesday. "We view that as a major success."

Romney, a Michigan native, won the statewide vote over Santorum 41 percent to 38 percent Tuesday in a hard-fought primary here. There are 30 delegates at stake in Michigan, 28 of which are awarded by congressional district and the remaining two based on the statewide vote. - Detroit News

The focus is the state wide delegates. Romney camp is saying 2-0, everyone else is saying 1-1.

Green Papers:

2 National Convention Delegates are to be proportionally bound to presidential contenders based on the statewide vote.

   A candidate must receive 15% of the statewide vote to be eligible to receive National Convention delegates. From those candidates meeting this threshold, proportionally bind the national convention delegates according to the statewide vote. Round factions to the nearest whole number (below 0.5 are rounded down, 0.5 and above are rounded up). If the end result is less than 12 delegates, allocate 1 additional delegate to the candidate receiving the most votes statewide. If the end result is more than 2 delegates, subtract 1 delegate from the candidate receiving the fewest votes statewide.


So take > 15% votes, which is just Mitt and Santorum. Giving about 53-47, 54-46 split. If you then proportionally bind, Mitt gets 1.1 or so, and Santorum gets .9, which when rounded, clearly both go to one delegate each.

With this formula, for a candidate to get both delegates, their number would have to be > 1.5, or 75% of the vote for the 2 candidates. Clearly didn't happen.

Update: I guess the rules have changed:

Statement by Saul Anuzis
Republican National Committeeman from Michigan
Member of the Michigan Republican Credentials Committee

At the February 4th State Committee meeting held in Lansing, the Credentials Committee unanimously passed the procedures for allocating Michigan’s delegates to the National Convention in the event that the RNC imposes the 50% penalty on our delegation.

We agreed that if only 30 delegates would be designated as voting delegates, the Michigan Republicans would send 2 from each congressional committee and 2 at large. We agreed that the two at large delegates would be taken from the top of the slated delegations as submitted by the candidate who received the most votes statewide.

Last night the Credentials Committee met via teleconference and voted to apply the rules as passed unanimously on February 4th which results in the 2 at large delegates be awarded to the statewide winner, Mitt Romney.

There were no changes in rules or procedures, the Credential Committee only ratified the existing rules as previously passed after some made erroneous claims to the media that the at-large delegates would be split.

There is no disagreement amongst the members that this was the intent of the Credential Committee and there is email traffic between the committee members and counsel discussing the same.

Regrettably, there was an error in the memo drafted and sent to the respective campaigns. There were questions raised at the time the memo was drafted as to whether the legal language used was accomplishing the goal of the committee and we were advised that it was, but now it is clear that the memo did not properly communicate the intent of the committee. The email traffic surrounding the drafting of the memo in early February makes explicitly clear what the intent of the committee was.

The committee convened again last night to affirm that the intent was clear and that the memo was inaccurate. That affirmation came in a 4-2 vote. While we all regret the error in the memo, it does not change what was voted on by the committee, which was to award the two at-large delegates to the statewide winner. It was premature for any candidate to be declaring the delegate count prior to an official announcement by the Michigan Republican Party

This is much to do about nothing. The rules were set in place, in advance, by a unanimous vote. A press conference should not force Michigan Republicans to change the rules. The

The Santorum camp responds:

"There’s just no way this is happening. We’ve all heard rumors that Mitt Romney was furious that he spent a fortune in his home state, had all the political establishment connections and could only tie Rick Santorum.  But we never thought the Romney campaign would try to rig the outcome of an election by changing the rules after the vote. This kind of back room dealing political thuggery just cannot and should not happen in America."

We've updated the sidebar and the spreadsheet for the new 16-14 allocation.

Oreo :: Romney campaign questions delegate tie in Michigan

Follow Democratic Convention Watch on Facebook and Twitter. Iphone/Android apps available.

Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

this boggles (0.00 / 0)
This boggles the mind.  Their own statement proves the transparency of the power grab, and for so little power.  If this winner take all of the state-wide delegates was agreed to unanimously why was it only affirmed 4-2? Or are we to believe that the 2 No votes were a brazen power grab by Santorum which he lost?  Clearly it was a brazen power grab by people in leadership positions of the Michigan GOP one way or the other.

How hard could it possibly be to state that the state-wide winner gets both delegates in any kind of language, legalese or otherwise?  Is their defense that they don't know how to speak English?

I can't wait til the Credential fight at the Republican convention.  It will be fun to watch.  I thought the problems with Florida and Arizona would be just glossed over.  But now?  There is no avoiding it unless someone has the nomination well in hand.


What boggles my mind (0.00 / 0)
is what they would have done if Santorum had won. Given that the MI GOP establishment is all in Romney's corner, including Anuzis, who is a non-super superdelegate.

[ Parent ]
the wording is a bit obtuse, probably intentionally to obscure any binding rule (0.00 / 0)
it looks like if there are less than 12 at large delegates, a second delegate will be added tot he statewide winner and taken from the lesser threshold winner, giving R 2 and S 0, which is the way the committee seems to have interpeted it. either way, i cant see the one delegate mattering, but i think the "who won michigan?" rallying cry will haunt both candidates and the party, especially for political junkies, not sure it will matter in the general. and even if it does, i am pretty sure they are both competing for the right to lose to obama!


Menu


Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

Make a New Account


Currently 0 user(s) logged on.



Subscribe to Posts

DemConWatch on Twitter
DemConWatch on Facebook


View blog authority

Add to Technorati Favorites

Wikio - Top Blogs - Politics

Who links to my website?

Sign the Petition (A)
Powered by: SoapBlox