Welcome to Democratic Convention Watch

Donate to DCW


Follow DCW on Twitter
Follow DCW on Facebook
2012 Democratic Convention
2012 Republican Convention Charlotte Host Committee
DNCC
2010 Census

Follow DCW on Google+
DCW iPhone App Info
A Guide to DemConWatch
Tags
FAQ
2008 Democratic Primary Links
2008 Democratic National Convention Links
DemConWatch Archives '05-'08
DemConWatch Speeches
Inauguration Information
DCW Store

HOME
Mobile Version




Search


Advanced Search
Contributors:
MattOreo
DocJess

This site is not affiliated with the DNC, DNCC, or any campaign.

Email us at

Blog Roll
Frontloading HQ
The Field
MyDD
Swing State Project
DemNotes
DemRulz

DCW in the News
St. Louis Channel 2 News
AP
Politico
Wall Street Journal
The New York Times
NPR
Wired
US News & World Report

Sunday Stories: How Many Do YOU Know?

by: DocJess

Sun May 06, 2012 at 06:10:17 AM EDT


Listed below are three stories, all true. They are things that are going on in America right now, and I'm very interested in determining how many of them you know about. When I bring them up amoungst people I know who read newspapers, read news online, watch tv and are fundamentally "informed", they don't know about all (or sometimes even any) of them. I consider this a problem with the media, who aren't telling the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. Not that they ever did, as a whole, but it seems to be getting worse. Here goes.

#1: This Tuesday, a ballot initiative called "Amendment 1" will appear on North Carolina ballots. It reads:

Constitutional amendment to provide that marriage between one man and one woman is the only domestic legal union that shall be valid or recognized in this State.

The most heinous part of this proposal is not just that the rights of the minority should NEVER be a ballot issue, but that couples (same sex or male-female) lose all protections they now have. For example, an unmarried woman would lose the legal standing to get a restraining order against her live-in boyfriend. 

#2: In Michigan (and to a lesser extent Indiana and New York) Emergency Managers have been put in place to run cities and towns. These folks have the right to invalidate contracts, sell city assets, fire city workers, deny elected officials the right to hold meetings, and fundamentally serve as mini-dictators over all aspects of city government.  An attempt was made to put repeal of the enabling legislation on the ballot, but the Board of Canvassers (who needed to certify the petitions) disregarded the position of the Board of Elections, and on a party-line vote deadlocked, therefore denying the ballot issue. Their gripe? The petitions used the wrong font size.

The problem with Emergency Managers is that they completely usurp the democratic process of electing officials, honouring the contracts put in place by those officials, and in general, they don't work out in terms of "saving" the economies of the towns and cities they are charged with running.

#3: Tom Corbett's Pennsylvania budget cuts from schools, infrastructure improvements, Medicaid, food stamps, and everything else reasonable people believe in. Doubtless you knew that, and possibly even knew that with the latest cuts, the total cut this year and next fiscal year specifically to education is about $1 Billion dollars. You probably also knew that the reason Corbett likes cutting school budgets is because he and his friends make money on charter schools. But did you know that the state ended the 2010-2011 fiscal year with a surplus of close to $200 million dollars? 

DocJess :: Sunday Stories: How Many Do YOU Know?

Follow Democratic Convention Watch on Facebook and Twitter. Iphone/Android apps available.

Tags: (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

wasnt aware of the emergency managers (0.00 / 0)
bet they re award contracts based on rewarding the local GOP connected individuals and corporations... just a guess

thoughts (0.00 / 0)
I've never understood why it is so easy to amend some state's constitutions.  Why don't they require a 3/5 or 2/3 majority in the referendum?  It takes what a 2/3 vote by congress and 3/4 approval of states to amend the federal constitution[I don't think the convention approach has been used since the Bill of Rights, but I could be wrong]?  On the other hand does that mean these 'amendments' are just as easy to undo?  And why allow the vote during the primary?  That seems misguided and designed to get low turnout.

For the Michigan thing, I don't think it should go unmentioned that the font size wasn't wrong.  Apparently the font size was correct, but they didn't like the font used.  Play around with it in a word processor and you can see how font choice can affect the size of 14-point fonts.  The font itself wasn't specified in the law so theoretically couldn't be wrong.  It should also be pointed out that the ruling saying it was 'too small' was a 2-2 party line vote.

For Pennsylvania, the 2010-2011 surplus seems to be on the back of a 500+ million dollar accounting gimmick[they transferred money from a fund which they obviously can't do every year].  They seem to be 300 million dollars short for 2011-2012[though they have reserves to cover it].  They are projecting a surplus for 2012-2013 so hopefully they restore some of the cuts, but Republicans are so insane who knows.  It also shows how much could be done if we can regain control of at least one of either the state senate/house in the fall.


State Constitutions (0.00 / 0)

There are a variety of different rules for state constituions.

For the most part, those that permit voter sponsored amendments have higher requirement for getting on the ballot for a constituional change than for a statutory change.

For legislative-proposed changes, it is still a two step process.  First needing to get through the legislature and then approved by the voters.

There is a small number of states that require consecutive elections or consecutive legislatures to amend the state constitution.

At the federal level, there has not been a second constitutional amendment, but state conventions instead of state legislatures were used to ratify the 21st amendment (repealing prohibition).

Most states give the executive some discretion as to when to schedule the vote on a constitutional amendment.  It was probably placed on the ballot for the primary to keep it off the general election ballot where it might increase conservative turnout.



[ Parent ]
several amendments not a second convention. (0.00 / 0)
 i am sure you meant that, but thought it ought be clear

[ Parent ]


Menu


Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

Make a New Account


Currently 0 user(s) logged on.



Subscribe to Posts

DemConWatch on Twitter
DemConWatch on Facebook


View blog authority

Add to Technorati Favorites

Wikio - Top Blogs - Politics

Who links to my website?

Sign the Petition (A)
Powered by: SoapBlox