Welcome to Democratic Convention Watch

Donate to DCW

Follow DCW on Twitter
Follow DCW on Facebook
2016 Democratic Convention
2016 Republican Convention Charlotte Host Committee
2010 Census

Follow DCW on Google+
DCW iPhone App Info
A Guide to DemConWatch
2008 Democratic Primary Links
2008 Democratic National Convention Links
DemConWatch Archives '05-'08
DemConWatch Speeches
Inauguration Information
DCW Store

Mobile Version


Advanced Search

This site is not affiliated with the DNC, DNCC, or any campaign.

Email us at

Blog Roll
Frontloading HQ
The Field
Swing State Project

DCW in the News
St. Louis Channel 2 News
Wall Street Journal
The New York Times
US News & World Report

Coburn keeps up attack on convention public financing

by: Matt

Mon Jun 11, 2012 at 22:34:16 PM EDT

Senator Tom Coburn attacked convention financing last month, and he's at it again, this time with friends:

Sens. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) and Mark Udall (D-Colo.) will introduce legislation Monday ending federal funding to party conventions in presidential elections.

The legislation stops the Democratic or Republican parties from using Presidential Election Campaign Funds (PECF) for party conventions. The legislation would apply to conventions after Dec. 31, 2012, meaning it would not affect conventions scheduled to take place in late August and early September of this election cycle.

Instead of conventions, the money would go to the Treasury to help reduce the deficit.

"Voluntarily returning convention funds would be a great act of leadership and statesmanship for both parties. Nevertheless, it’s time for Congress to act and end the practice of subsidizing annual convention parties with taxpayer dollars," Coburn said in a statement on Monday.

And Washington Post liberal columnist Jonathan Bernstein agrees:

I’m not sure that it makes sense for the federal government to subsidize the party structure, as opposed to subsidizing candidates. But it’s a lot harder to argue that it makes sense for the government to pay for this particular part of the candidates’ campaigns. About all I can come up with is that it’s a back-door way to preserve a bit of partial public financing, which I think is a stretch; or that there’s some compelling federal interest in preserving the form (if not the original function) of the conventions. I’m not sure the conventions would survive without the subsidy, but as much as I personally love the traditions, I pretty much think that if the parties and campaigns aren’t willing to pony up for them, there’s no reason to bother.

We'll have to see if the conventions this summer, and their lack of drama, help drive this effort in future years.

Matt :: Coburn keeps up attack on convention public financing

Follow Democratic Convention Watch on Facebook and Twitter. Iphone/Android apps available.

Tags: , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

i support defunding the conventions (0.00 / 0)
but the money needs to be put into funding indiviual primary campaigns and general election campaigns, not retiring the decifit. the truth is, the amount of money given to the candidates in aggregate total is still not significant toward the debt. giving good candidates a chance to get their message out and compete with the big money candidates is more likely to lead to better presidents who have the ability to help solve debt issues, and other issues more important than debt.




Forget your username or password?

Make a New Account

Currently 0 user(s) logged on.

Subscribe to Posts

DemConWatch on Twitter
DemConWatch on Facebook

View blog authority

Add to Technorati Favorites

Wikio - Top Blogs - Politics

Who links to my website?

Sign the Petition (A)
Powered by: SoapBlox