Welcome to Democratic Convention Watch

Donate to DCW

Follow DCW on Twitter
Follow DCW on Facebook
2016 Democratic Convention
2016 Republican Convention Charlotte Host Committee
2010 Census

Follow DCW on Google+
DCW iPhone App Info
A Guide to DemConWatch
2008 Democratic Primary Links
2008 Democratic National Convention Links
DemConWatch Archives '05-'08
DemConWatch Speeches
Inauguration Information
DCW Store

Mobile Version


Advanced Search

This site is not affiliated with the DNC, DNCC, or any campaign.

Email us at

Blog Roll
Frontloading HQ
The Field
Swing State Project

DCW in the News
St. Louis Channel 2 News
Wall Street Journal
The New York Times
US News & World Report

Alaska Tea

by: tmess2

Sat Aug 23, 2014 at 10:40:11 AM EDT

Earlier this week, with the results coming in early Wednesday morning for the majority of us living in the lower 48, Alaska held its primaries.  For the purposes of national politics, the key primary was the Republican Senate primary with the winner getting the right to face Democratic Senator Mark Begich in November.  There were three major candidates -- two supported by various parts of the national Republican establishment (Dan Sullivan and Lt. Gov. Mead Treadwell) and one Tea Party candidate (2010 nominee Joe Miller).  At the end of the day, Sullivan got 40% of the vote to Miller's 32%.  Having gotten a "mainstream" candidate in a solidly Republican state, Republicans have to be salivating about the possibility of regaining this seat (which they lost due to the Ted Stevens fiasco in 2008), but what if?

The what if in this case is Joe Miller.  In 2010, Joe Miller beat Senator Lisa Murkowski in the Republican Senate Primary.  Senator Murkowsi did not accept the primary defeat and ran as a write-in candidate.  Now the shoe is on the other foot.  If the establishment wing of the Republican Party of Alaska feels that it is not bound by the primary results and can re-run its candidate as a write-in in the general election, why should the Tea Party accept the primary results.  Of course, the big difference between 2010 and 2014 is that, this time, the Democrats have a viable candidate who would be helped if a significant number of Republicans voted for a write-in candidate (and will not be tempted to support the write-in candidate).  (In 2010, Murkowski won the general election over Miller by 39% to 35% with the Democrat getting 23%, by contrast the Democratic candidate for governor got 37% and President Obama got 40% in 2012). 

So the question for the next several weeks is does Joe Miller accept his primary loss or does he decide to follow the example of his 2010 opponent and run as a write-in.  What happens in November may turn on the answer to this question. 

tmess2 :: Alaska Tea

Follow Democratic Convention Watch on Facebook and Twitter. Iphone/Android apps available.

Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Alaska Tea | 1 comments
or could a dirty tricks 501 3c (0.00 / 0)
help fund him, and persuade him to run?
dont tell me the dems don't have any dirty tricks 501 3cs.....

Alaska Tea | 1 comments




Forget your username or password?

Make a New Account

Currently 0 user(s) logged on.

Subscribe to Posts

DemConWatch on Twitter
DemConWatch on Facebook

View blog authority

Add to Technorati Favorites

Wikio - Top Blogs - Politics

Who links to my website?

Sign the Petition (A)
Powered by: SoapBlox