-
Recent Posts
Search
Welcome to DCW
Upcoming Events
7/15/24 - GOP Convention
TBD - Democratic Convention
11/5/24 - Election DayTools
Archives
Tag Cloud
2008 Democratic National Convention 2012 Democratic National Convention 2012 Republican National Convention 2016 Democratic National Convention 2016 Republican National Convention 2020 Census 2020 Delegate Selection Plans 2020 Democratic Convention 2024 Democratic Convention 2024 Republican Convention Abortion Affordable Care Act Alabama Arizona Bernie Sanders California Delegate Selection Donald Trump Florida Free Exercise Clause Free Speech Georgia Hillary Clinton Immigration Iowa Joe Biden John Kasich Kansas Maine Marco Rubio Michigan Missouri Nevada New Hampshire North Carolina Ohio Pennsylvania redistricting South Carolina Supreme Court Ted Cruz Texas Virginia Voting Rights Act WisconsinDCW in the News
Blog Roll
Site Info
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- DocJess on GOP convention plans remain in flux
- tmess2 on Dems prepare for virtual voting by delegates
- DocJess on GOP Jacksonville money woes continue
- DocJess on Dems prepare for virtual voting by delegates
- tmess2 on GOP now looking at outdoor Jacksonville convention
Archives
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- November 2014
- September 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- March 2014
- January 2014
- August 2013
- August 2012
- November 2011
- August 2011
- January 2011
- May 2010
- January 2009
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
Categories
- 2019-nCoV
- 2020 Convention
- 2020 General Election
- 2020DNC
- 2024 Convention
- 2028 Convention
- Anti-Semitism
- Bernie Sanders
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Civil Rights
- Cleveland
- Climate Change
- Coronavirus
- Coronavirus Tips
- COVID-19
- Debates
- Delegate Count
- Delegates
- Democratic Debates
- Democratic Party
- Democrats
- DemsinPhilly
- DemsInPHL
- Disaster
- DNC
- Donald Trump
- Economy
- Elections
- Electoral College
- Federal Budget
- Freedom of the Press
- General Election Forecast
- GOP
- Healthcare
- Hillary Clinton
- Holidays
- Hotels
- House of Representatives
- Houston
- Identity Politics
- Impeachment
- Iowa Caucuses
- Jacksonville
- Joe Biden
- Judicial
- LGBT
- Mariner Pipeline
- Merrick Garland
- Meta
- Milwaukee
- Money in Politics
- Music
- National Security
- Netroots Nation
- New Yor
- New York
- NH Primary
- Notes from Your Doctor
- NoWallNoBan
- Pandemic
- Philadelphia
- PHLDNC2016
- Platform
- Politics
- Polls
- Presidential Candidates
- Primary and Caucus Results
- Primary Elections
- Public Health
- Rant
- Republican Debates
- Republicans
- Resist
- RNC
- Russia
- Senate
- Snark
- Student Loan Debt
- Sunday with the Senators
- Superdelegates
- Syria
- The Politics of Hate
- Uncategorized
- Vaccines
- War
- Weekly White House Address
Meta
Category Archives: Elections
South Carolina Recap
It’s hard interpreting the Republican results for president this year. If Donald Trump were the incumbent, the numbers that he is getting would be the sign of substantial opposition within the party. If this year were a truly open primary (i.e. he was not being treated as the “incumbent candidate” by Republicans), his results would be outstanding.
But the bigger story out of Saturday might be at the Congressional District level and is about the House of Representatives, not the presidency. Nikki Haley only won one of the seven congressional districts — the First District. Nancy Mace is the current, two-term, incumbent. She was one of the “Freedom Caucus Eight” who voted to vacate the chair. Kevin McCarthy is apparently planning on supporting a primary challenger to Representative Mace. Does the fact that Nikki Haley got 53% of the vote show that a majority of the Republicans in the First District will support an establishment challenger to a Trumpist candidate. If so, the Representative Mace’s time in Congress might be coming to a quick end. Additionally, while the lines were a little different, the last time that the Republicans were this divided and supported the more extreme primary candidate, the Democrats managed to win this district (in 2018). So, if the Democrats find a credible candidate for the general and Representative Mace wins the primary, perhaps enough real Republicans do not vote in the general or opt to vote for the Democrat to take this seat away from the Freedom Caucus.
Also posted in GOP, House of Representatives, Primary and Caucus Results, Primary Elections
Tagged Donald Trump, Freedom Caucus, Keven McCarthy, Nancy Mace, Nikki Haley, South Carolina
Leave a comment
2024 Presidential Primaries — South Carolina Republicans and Michigan
As we head into the last week of February, we are also reaching the end of the authorized early primaries. Under the respective rules of the two parties, there is a preliminary window in which only some states were authorized to hold early primaries/caucuses. For the Republicans, the “regular” primary window opens on March 1. For Democrats, the “regular” primary window opens on the first Tuesday in March (March 5).
For this last week, we have three primaries on the book. First up, today, is the South Carolina Republican primary. South Carolina law allows the parties to choose the date of their own primary, and the two parties have tended to choose different dates (but usually a Saturday). And so we had the Democratic primary several weeks back which was won by President Joe Biden. Now, it’s the Republican primary. While there are seven candidates on the ballot, two of them are not known nationally, and three of the nationally-known candidates have dropped out. In other words, while five of the candidates may get some votes, there are only two with any chance of winning delegates — former South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley and a candidate who ineligible to be president, Donald Trump. South Carolina Republicans use a “winner-take-most” system for allocating delegates. In other words, each congressional district has three delegates and whomever wins that district gets all three delegates. Likewise, there are twenty-nine at-large delegates, and whomever wins the state gets all twenty-nine delegates. Especially with only two serious candidates in the races, whomever wins statewide will have won at least one congressional district (and probably will have won more than one). Thus, the winner of the primary is guaranteed to take at least 32 of the 50 delegates (which is why this type of system is referred to as winner-take-most). Despite the fact that Nikki Haley used to be the governor of South Carolina, the traditional Republican Party in South Carolina is dead and has been replaced by the Trump Party. While anybody who did not vote in the Democratic Primary could theoretically vote in the Republican Primary, there probably will not be enough independents and Democrats voting to save the Republican Party from itself. Polls show Donald Trump leading by a wide enough margin that he should win all fifty delegates, and the only question is whether Nikki Haley can make it close enough to steal a district or two.
On Tuesday, we will primaries for both parties in Michigan. President Joe Biden should win the state easily. Neither Representative Dean Phillips nor Marianne Williamson is a serious contender to reach the fifteen percent to win delegates. The real contender to take delegates away from President Biden is “uncommitted.” Representative Rashida Tlaib has been encouraging voters to vote for uncommitted in protest of President Biden’s middle of the road stance on Israel’s response to Hamas’s invasion of Israel. While the pro-Palestinian progressive wing of the Democratic Party has a problem with Israel trying to remove Hamas from the Gaza Strip, if President Biden were to do what they want him to do, it would guarantee Donald Trump’s victory in November. If uncommitted stays below 15% (state-wide or in any individual district), President Biden will win all of the delegates (state-wide or in that district). The largest districts have seven delegates; so it is unlikely that uncommitted will get more than one delegate in any individual district. The one exception to that might be Representative Tlaib’s district. And the issue in that district will be whether uncommitted can get to the 21% necessary to win a second delegate. If uncommitted does not win any delegates in that district, we could see a primary challenge to Representative Tlaib emerge. State-wide, there are twenty-five at-large delegates and fifteen party-leader delegates. As such, if uncommitted were to get to fifteen percent state-wide, uncommitted would get, at least, four at-large and two party-leader delegates. But the expectation is that President Biden will win almost all of the 117 delegates at stake on Tuesday.
Also posted in Donald Trump, Primary Elections
Tagged Dean Phillips, Donald Trump, Joe Biden, Marianne Williamson, Michigan, Nikki Haley, Rashida Tlaib, South Carolina
Leave a comment
The Trump Ballot Case and the Precedents of Nat Turner and John Brown
On Friday, the United Staes Supreme Court decided to grant President Trump’s Petition for Certiorari in Trump vs. Anderson. However, it took no action on the companion Petition for Certiorari filed by the Colorado Republican Party in Colorado State Republican Central Committee v. Anderson. Before turning to the issues raised in this case, there are two things to note about the Supreme Court order granting review and the petitions filed.
First, in granting Trump’s petition, the Supreme Court implicitly recognized the necessity to resolve this issue quickly. The briefs of Trump and his enablers in the Republican Party (and related organizations) are due on January 18, less than two weeks after the order granting review (as opposed to the usual 45 days). The briefs of Trump’s challengers and the Colorado election official who are in the middle of this case are due thirteen days later on January 31 (along with any outside brief from individuals who want to support Democracy) with any reply briefs due five days later on February 5. This contrast to the normal deadlines of 45 days for petitioner’s brief with respondent’s brief due 30 days later and the reply brief an additional 35 days later. Additionally, the case will be argued on February 8 which is a special setting in the middle of what would otherwise have been the Supreme Court’s winter break.
Second, the Supreme Court did not rewrite Trump’s question presented. Typically, the question prsented in a petition for certiorari is narrowly focused on one legal issue. For example, did the lower court err in finding that the potential for the metabolizing of blood alcohol content is an automatic exigent circumstance permitting law enforcement officers to conduct a warrantless blood draw? If there are multiple issues in a case, the petition will present multiple questions on which the Supreme Court can pick and choose which issues will be considered at the time that the petition is granted. For example, the Colorado Republican Party presented three issues: 1) does Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment apply to the President; 2) is Section 3 self-executing; and 3) does disqualifying a candidate violate the First Amendment rights of political parties. By contrast, the Trump Petition, after noting the ruling (that his actions and the office of President fell within the restrictions of Section) simply asks whether the Colorado Supreme Court erred by excluding him from the ballot. In other words, unlike the usual question which identifies a specific legal error in the ruling, the Supreme Court appears to be allowing the consideration of any potential theory on why the Colorado Supreme Court erred.
Also posted in 2024 Convention, Donald Trump, GOP, Judicial, Republicans, RNC
Tagged Colorado, Donald Trump, Insurrection, John Brown, Nate Turner, rebellion, Section 3, Section 5., Supreme Court, Whiskey Rebellion
Comments Off on The Trump Ballot Case and the Precedents of Nat Turner and John Brown
Special Elections 2024
Things are about to get very interesting in the House of Representatives. While there have been a large number of representatives who are not running for re-election. The irony of Republicans explaining their reason for leaving as the unpleasant environment in Congress is hard to miss. But the focus of this post is not on those leaving in January 2025. It is those who have left (involuntarily) or are about to be leaving mid-term.
At the present time, we have a vacancy in New York’s Third District due to the expulsion of fraudster who called himself George Santos. (And the fact that the majority of House Republicans did not want to expel him despite overwhelming evidence of fraud while wanting to open an impeachment of President Biden with no evidence says something about the shell of a serious political party that the Republicans have become). But we have also had announcements of the intent to resign in three other districts (so far) — California’s Twentieth District (former Speaker Kevin McCarthy who will be leaving sometime later this month or in early January), New York’s Twenty-Sixth District (Democrat Brian Higgins who will be leaving in February), and Ohio’s Sixth District (Republican Bill Johnson who will be leaving in March).
These departures in the House will alter the size of the Republican majority in the House. The rules for vacancies in the House are different than the rules for vacancies in the Senate. Under the Seventeenth Amendment, the governor of each state can temporarily fill a vacancy in the Senate until an election can be held to fill the balance of the term. By contrast, there is no equivalent provision for the House. Thus a House seat remains vacant until there is a special election. For both the House and the Senate, the timing of the special election is left to the state. Especially for the Senate, there is a wide range of rules with some states leaving the appointee in office until the next regularly scheduled election (which can create the weirdness of having two elections for the same office — one for the last three to four weeks of the current term and one for the next term — at the same time) and others requiring a prompt special election. But the states also have different rules for the scheduling of House elections (and who chooses the candidates).
Also posted in House of Representatives
Tagged Bill Johnson, Brian Higgins, California, George Santos, Kevin McCarthy, New York, Ohio, special elections, vacancies
Comments Off on Special Elections 2024
A Manchin-less Senate
This week, Senator Joe Manchin (I/D — WVa) announced that he would not be running for re-election. If Senator Manchin does not end up on the “Let’s split the anti-Trump vote” “No Labels” ticket, this decision is both positive and negative for what Democrats might be able to do in the 2025-26 Congress.
To paraphrase a saying attributed to Karl Rove, progressive want to nominate the most progressive candidate that can win a general election. In West Virginia, Joe Manchin might just have been the most progressive candidate that Democrats could nominate and still have a chance at winning. His name recognition and reputation allowed him to win a state in which the average Democrat has hoping to receive 40-45% of the vote in the general election.
Is it possible that, one day in the future, Democrats could be competitive in West Virginia again? Yes. But, in one crucial way, West Virginia resembles the pre-Civil War South. In today’s West Virginia, coal mining is a key industry. While only 2% of the state directly works in coal (like only a tiny percentage of Southerners owned slaves), coal is the second largest industry (beyond the health sector) based on GDP generated. In many parts of the state, if coal mining stopped tomorrow, there would be significant job losses in many areas of the state which would also cause retail and service industries to decline in those areas. And the number who see their livelihood as tied to coal is a large enough percent to make the pro-coal vote a significant block in West Virginia elections. This puts Democrats in a bind. It is essential for the nation and the world for the U.S. to reduce its reliance on coal. But recognizing and acting on this necessity hurts Democrats in West Virginia. As such, the reality is that without Joe Manchin running, it is almost certain that Democrats will lose the Senate race in West Virginia. And given how close the Senate is currently divided, the loss of this seat will make it harder for Democrats to have a majority in the Senate after the 2024 election.
Also posted in Senate
Tagged 2024 Senate elections, Joe Manchin, West Virginia
Comments Off on A Manchin-less Senate
November 2023 Elections
In the U.S., in something that would be a surprise to the Franers, the presidential election has become the “main” election. Turnout is always highest for the presidential election. But that is not the only only election, and other elections can be even more important. To save money, most states have their statewide elections coincide with federal elections (either the presidential election or the mid-term election). But a handful of states have taken a different approach and hold their elections in odd-numbered years. In addition, many states (while holding the elections for state offices at the same time as federal election in even-numbered years) hold local elections in the odd-numbered years. And most states, even if November in odd-numbered years is not a “regular” election date keep it available as a potential election date for special elections and propositions. This year, the November election will feature several big races.
At the state-wide office level, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Kentucky hold their elections for governor in the year immediately proceeding the presidential election. Louisiana is a little different because it holds a “jungle primary” which is actually an open general election (i.e. no party primaries) with a runoff if nobody gets 50%. This “primary” election was several weeks ago, and the Republicans picked up the governor’s office in Louisiana. Given that Louisiana is a deep red state, this pickup was not too surprising as it takes the right Democrat to have a chance at winning and the incumbent Democrat was term limited. The new governor is a right wing extremist, and we will probably be hearing a lot of nonsense out of the Pelican State for the next eight years.
But the races for Governor in Kentucky and Mississippi will be on Tuesday. (At least the initial vote will be on Tuesday as Mississippi has a runoff provision if nobody gets to 50%.) The governor in Kentucky is a Democrat and the governor in Mississippi is a Republican. Both are favored to be reelected but the challengers in both states have chances at pulling an upset. In Kentucky, the challengers big advantage is that he is a Republican. But the Republican candidate has been a controversial figure as Attorney General, and the Democratic incumbent is popular which might be just enough to hold onto the office. In Mississippi, the Governor has gotten entangled in some scandals and the challenger happens to be a member of a famous family even if that fame was over 50 years ago. But Mississippi is still a deep red state. In short, the most likely outcome is that there will be no changes, but it is also possible that either or both states could flip.
Tagged 2023 Election, Abortion, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia
Comments Off on November 2023 Elections
Candidate Trump — Felon Ballot Access Restrictions and the Fourteenth Amendment
We are heading into uncharted waters. A major political party has become a cult in thrall to a person who may not be eligible to run for president (or at least barred from the ballot in several states) who insists that he should be the nominee in 2024. Add to that a martyr complex by the true believers who have taken over many state parties, and we are heading into potential chaos for the Fall of 2024.
Of course, one of the complexities is that the national election for president is when the electoral college meets and votes and sends those votes to Congress to be counted. Up until that Wednesday in December, we have fifty-one elections for presidential electors and more elections for delegates to the nominating convention. Each of the jurisdictions (states and territories) involved in these elections have different rules and procedures.
Having said that, there are several general things that are consistent from state to state. First, for the general elections, the parties certify the name of their presidential and vice-presidential candidate in late August or early September. Second, there is a state election authority which receives and processes the candidate paperwork for state and federal candidates. For the most part, these officials rarely refuse candidate filings, but they are tasked with determining whether the filing to be on the ballot is complete and shows that the candidate is eligible to run under state law. Third, decisions on whether a candidate qualifies to be on the ballot is subject to some form of judicial review. But, assuming that the election authority finds that a candidate is eligible to run, the different states have different rules on who can challenge that determination. In all, or almost every state, the opposing candidates have the right to bring such a case, but the rules as to who else has that right differs from state to state. Fourth, if, for some reason, a party’s nominee has to be replaced on the ballot, it generally falls on the state party to name a replacement. Fifth, for the presidential election, there is actually a ticket composed of the candidates for president, the vice-president, and the presidential electors. It is the last two or three where the potential for chaos emerges.
Also posted in Donald Trump, Electoral College, Judicial, Uncategorized
Tagged Ballot Access, Donald Trump, Felon Disqualification, Fourteenth Amendment, U.S. Supreme Court
Comments Off on Candidate Trump — Felon Ballot Access Restrictions and the Fourteenth Amendment
The Independent State Legislature Theory, Election Law, and the Trump Crimes
Recently, a federal grand jury in the District of Columbia returned an indictment charging the Orange Menance with crimes related to his attempted coup after the 2020 election. It is expected that within a week or two a state grand jury in Fulton County, Georgia will add state charges related to the efforts of dictator-wannabe Donald Trump to convince Georgia election authorities to alter the results of the election in that state.
Much of the crimes committed by Donald Trump and his band of incompetent coconspirators were based on a flawed version of the independent state legislature theory and a misunderstanding of election mechanics.
First, the independent state legislature theory. The independent state legislature theory is based on two clauses in the U.S. Constitution. One of the clauses is found in Article I and applies to the election of members of Congress. The other clauses is found in Article II and deals with the selection of presidential electors.
Also posted in 2020 General Election, Donald Trump, Electoral College
Tagged Criminal Charges, Donald Trump, Georgia, Independent State Legislature
Comments Off on The Independent State Legislature Theory, Election Law, and the Trump Crimes
Direct Democracy in Ohio
This Tuesday, voters in Ohio will decide the future of direct democracy in Ohio. For the most part, the U.S., like many other democracies is a republic. In other words, the usual way that laws get made is through the legislative process with elected representatives debating, amending, and voting on proposals. In theory, the will of the majority is expressed through their representatives. A little over a century ago, reformers during the Progressive Era argued that there were flaws in the representative system that sometimes allowed a minority to block useful and popular legislation. The remedy was the initiative and referendum process which allowed ordinary voters to get proposals on the ballot were they could be directly determined by the voters.
Now, not every state has authorized the initiative and referendum process. Even in those that do, the rules differ as to how many signatures are required. However, for the most part, states that allow for direct democracy (whether through proposals initiated by voters or by proposals referred to the voters by the government) only require a simple majority for the proposal to pass.
Even from the beginning, there has been resistance to the initiative and referendum process. After all, special interests that are able to get what they want from elected officials do not like the voters having the ability to override those efforts.
Also posted in GOP, Politics
Tagged Abortion, Initiatives, Ohio
Comments Off on Direct Democracy in Ohio