Monthly Archives: May 2015

June at the Supreme Court

It’s approaching that time of year again — June at the Supreme Court.  The time of year when — with Congress merely slogging things out on legislation — attention in Washington D.C. turns to the Supreme Court, and the Supreme Court obliges with major decision on top of major decision.

For reasons that probably date back to the days when the Supreme Court Justices also heard cases in the Circuit, the Supreme Court has a tradition of wrapping up the business of deciding cases by the end of June.  For the most part, during the first part of the annual term, the Justices tend to take between two and five months to write an opinion on a case, with the exact length depending on the complexity of a case, the Justice’s writing style, and whether the decision is unanimous (by tradition, other Justices are given the opportunity to complete their separate opinions on a case and all of the opinions on a case are issued at the same time if there are multiple opinions).  Since the most significant cases tend to be split decisions, that tends to push them back and major decision from the December and January arguments sessions may not be issued until late May or early June where they share space with the decisions from the February, March, and April argument sessions (on which the Supreme Court lacks the time to take for or more months to complete their work).  Heading into Tuesday’s session (as the Court is taking Memorial Day off with the rest of us), there are twenty-eight cases still waiting for opinions and 5-6 weeks to go.  (The Supreme Court is currently showing that it will be issuing opinions and orders the week of June 29th. )  Of course, not all of these cases are significant from a political perspective.  What follows is what is currently known about the cases that followers of this site might find significant.

Posted in Judicial | Tagged | Comments Off on June at the Supreme Court

Foreign Elections: The United Kingdom

Despite what some Republicans say (and apparently think), there are limits to U.S. power.  While the U.S. has the largest economy and the largest military, the U.S. simply does not have enough troops to intervene in every crisis in the world.  Similarly, there are numerous ways for countries to minimize the effect of U.S. economic sanctions.  Any significant international effort by the U.S. requires help from our allies.  However, for the most part, our allies are democracies which means that how their voters feel about U.S. proposals matters more than what the U.S. wants.  What happens in the elections in our allies matter.    This upcoming week (on May 7), voters in the United Kingdom will be voting in parliamentary elections.  As things stand with one week to go, we may be looking at another close race that could handicap the ability of the United Kingdom to commit to any major U.S. initiative.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Comments Off on Foreign Elections: The United Kingdom