Monthly Archives: August 2019

Virtual Voting and the 2020 Nomination

As Doc Jess noted yesterday, the Rules and By-Laws Committee (the party entity with responsibility for reviewing state party delegate selection plans) has found problems with the virtual caucus proposed by Iowa.  The concerns, however, extend beyond Iowa.  According to news reports, the RBC has also made a similar decision concerning Nevada’s delegate selection rules.

As I noted several weeks ago, there are now seven states left that do not use a state-run primary  with Iowa, Nevada, and Wyoming being the last pure caucus states and Alaska, Hawaii, Kansas, and North Dakota using party-run primaries.  In the revised delegate selection rules, Rule 2.G suggested that the RBC would consider plans that allowed internet voting as a form of absentee voting if the proposed plan included sufficient security assurances.  In its recent decision, the RBC apparently decided that — under current conditions — such assurances are not possible.  It is, however, understandable why Iowa and Nevada put forth proposals that relied on internet voting.  Rule 2.K.8 requires that parties using a party-run process create some alternative means of voting for those who are unable to participate in person on the day established for the caucus/party-run primary.

In light of these two provisions in the national rules, it’s not just Iowa that has included the possibility of electronic voting.  The draft plans in Alaska, Iowa, and Nevada include provisions for electronic voting.  The plans in Hawaii and North Dakota  opted to use mail-in voting instead of electronic voting.  (Alaska’s plan also includes absentee voting, so they might just need to eliminate the electronic voting.)  The plan in Kansas notes absentee/advanced voting as a possibility without further details.  If I am reading their plan correctly, Wyoming permits surrogate voting (which looks to be a proxy vote permitted in limited circumstances).  (I am not sure that proxy voting is allowed by the national rules — although it looks like Wyoming has used it previously from the comments submitted on their plan.  However, Wyoming’s plan has other problems that will probably require them to redraft their plans.) Continue Reading...

Posted in 2020 Convention, Delegates | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Virtual Voting and the 2020 Nomination

Could this be the end of the Iowa Caucuses?

The DNC has decided against Iowa’s virtual caucus plan. The Iowa plan was in response to the DNC’s requirement after 2016 that 2020 caucuses allow some sort of absentee voting. So this virtual voting was Iowa’s plan. The DNC said it was too easy to hack. And so, back to the drawing board, with a new plan to be delivered by mid-September. On the one hand, caucuses are long, not everyone can attend, and it’s a good idea to find a workaround. But, if you allow absentee voting, is it really that different from a primary?

Well, enter New Hampshire, which by law sets its primary at least a week prior to any other primary. If Iowa cannot come up with a way to please the DNC’s goal of increasing participation in caucuses without making their system a primary, then the calendar (which starts in only 5 months) may shift. Because if you cannot vote virtually, and you have to show up in person AND there has to be absentee voting, it certainly looks like a heavy lift to hold a caucus.

We know that the new Iowa plan favored activists over less-engaged voters. That is, the value of an in-person vote was greater than that of a virtual vote. And while I sadly cannot find the poll in question, I’d read that more of Warren and Sanders’ caucus-goers were in-person, compared to Biden’s. Continue Reading...

Posted in Iowa Caucuses, NH Primary, Primary Elections | Comments Off on Could this be the end of the Iowa Caucuses?

Delegates for convention spread throughout the midwest

No, not really. Just in Wisconsin and nearby Illinois:

Here’s the regional breakdown: Continue Reading...

Posted in 2020 Convention, Delegates | 2 Comments

Moulton, Inslee, and Hickenlooper drop out

Rep. Seth Moulton joined Gov, Jay Inslee and Gov. John Hickenlooper in dropping out of the 2020 race. With the much tighter requirements in place for the next debates, and the lure of political offices in their own state for Inslee and Hickenlooper, they saw the writing on the wall. That leaves us 18 major candidates (we’ll add Steyer to the list if he makes a debate), but 8 are in danger of not qualifying for the next debate. Ten candidates have qualified: Biden, Booker, Buttigieg, Castro, Harris, Klobuchar, O’Rourke, Sanders, Warren  and Yang. Steyer needs one more poll > 2%, Gabbard 2, and Gillibrand 3 plus more donors. Williamson, Bennet, Bullock, De Blasio, Delaney and Ryan debate chances are likely done.

Running:

  1. Rep. John Delaney
  2. Sec. Julian Castro
  3. Sen. Elizabeth Warren
  4. Rep. Tulsi Gabbard
  5. Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand
  6. Mayor Pete Buttigieg
  7. Sen. Kamala Harris
  8. Sen. Cory Booker
  9. Sen. Any Klobuchar
  10. Andrew Yang
  11. Sen. Bernie Sanders
  12. Rep. Beto O’Rourke
  13. Rep. Tim Ryan
  14. Sen. Michael Bennet
  15. VP Joe Biden
  16. Gov. Steve Bullock
  17. Mayor Bill De Blasio
  18. Marianne Williamson

Out: Continue Reading...

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Moulton, Inslee, and Hickenlooper drop out

How to Stop Mariner East

Yesterday, here in Chester County, PA, a group of activists, elected officials and concerned citizens met with Governor Tom Wolf about the Mariner East pipeline. You can watch the video here. Bottom line: people spoke about the impacts to themselves, their homes, their families. Above all, they spoke about the lack of an evacuation plan. And with Mariner, it is not an issue of whether it will blow, but when, and how many will die. They called on the Governor to halt construction of Mariner. He said no. Emphatically.

You may think that this does not affect you because you don’t live in the blast zone. And when you check the map, you may well be outside the ring of death. But there is a piece of legislation winding its way through the PA State House called “Restore PA” — one of the things it allows is more pipelines carrying fracking by-products comprised of volatile gases, headed for Europe to make single use plastics. Ergo “coming soon to your town, too.” And yeah, the pipeline purveyors have the right of eminent domain so they can just come for you….just sayin’. That link is to the text — it’s only 28 pages — you should read it because it’s the details that will tie Pennsylvania to fossil fuels for the next 20 years, and put taxpayers on the hook to pay off a huge bond if fracking decreases across the state.

So, what to do? We know that Wolf won’t change his mind. His plan IS “Restore PA”. And we know that this comes from his ties to the monies he has raised in his four races. You can see who has contributed to Tom (and any other state candidate) at this site. Two caveats: if donors give under $200, often they are often not mentioned, or are lumped together. Also – the most recent data on the site is from 2018 – they won’t post 2019 until the cycle is complete. And so, you can see information on candidates, and their PACs from previous elections and get a sense not only of who they received money from, but also to whom they donated. You will need to set up an account to download data.

Here’s what to do, and it’s something that will work. As an individual, you likely cannot contribute enough money to make a difference. You are not a union. You are not a bundler. (Apologies to the one bundler I know reads this site.) But you are a voter. (If you live in Pennsylvania, are 18 or over, and NOT a voter, call me, and I’ll get you set up in no time flat.) And there are people running for Boards of Supervisors, City Councils, County Commissions, and other positions THIS YEAR who have the power, IF ELECTED, to stop the pipeline in their towns, cities and counties. No matter what Wolf does. As the lawsuits and grand juries and protests continue their paths — THESE PEOPLE have the ability to make it stop.

All local candidates canvass. They show up at community events. Some are running for re-election so they are at Board/Council meetings. They are easy to find.

Tell them something like this….personalize it for what fits your situation. And say it TO THEIR FACES – not a note, not a signed petition — look into their eyes as they shake your hand…

“Candidate X, my name is _________________________, and while I like you, and most of what you stand for, unless and until you call for an all out moratorium on Mariner East in <town, city, county>, I cannot vote for you. Nothing else you stand for is more important than protecting the innocent lives that will be extinguished by the pipeline when it blows up. I hope you will do the right thing so I CAN vote for you this November 5th.”

Be polite, be direct. They need your vote. Explain what they need to do to earn it. Then get 5 friends to follow in your footsteps.

Posted in Climate Change, Mariner Pipeline | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on How to Stop Mariner East

Jewish in America: 2019

I have a friend named Jane. We met in the first grade. She is smart and talented, and I’m happy that we still get to chat all these years later. Back in late 2016, we talked about the threat to Jews from the election of Cheeto Führer. We anticipated that there would eventually be camps. Yes. Like in the 1930’s. We further posited that we Jews would not be tops on the Immigrant-Bashing Carnival Barker’s list because most of us were lighter-skinned than others and he worshiped Sheldon Adelson’s money.

And here we are. Yesterday, any doubt that ANYONE (I’m talking to you Sheldon) had about Trump’s anti-Semitism was permanently put to rest. This is not a surprise to any Jews with the exception of the far right uber-Orthodox, who have an absurd view of the world.

The response has been singular from Democrats, Republicans, people across the spectrum: condemnation of the anti-Semitic trope. There has been a certain amount of silence from the Klan, and the Proud Boys and the other White Nationalists because even they realize that it’s not a great idea to proclaim your hatred for Jews publicly. But they certainly got the message, (again) and we can expect EVEN MORE desecration of Jewish cemeteries, swastikas spray painted on synagogues, and then, the shootings.

Yesterday, I wrote about identity politics, and how I prefer inclusion to separation. And in certain ways, I don’t “identify” as Jewish. As in, I’m not religious – I only see the inside of a synagogue for Bar/Bat Mitzvahs and weddings. I don’t keep a Kosher home, and my Quaker husband has been known to throw pork on the grill. I’m agnostic. I tell people that I’m a “food Jew” — meaning that I love bliintzes, chopped herring and a bagel with a schmear.

My late mother used to say that it didn’t matter if I didn’t practice, the anti-Semites knew who the Jews were, hated us and meant us harm. And I know that the most fundamental Jewish ideals are inculcated in my being. That one should leave the world a better place the day he dies than how he found it the day he was borne. The ideals of charity and education. And פיקוח נפש (pikuach nefesh) the principle that the preservation of human life overrides virtually every other consideration.

It’s been politically incorrect to say that the Narcissistic Human Airhorn is akin to Hitler, and they he stirs up American Nazism. But I’m a private citizen, and until Trumpkin’s minions lock me up in the camps for being an activist, I still have use of the 1st Amendment (and I know there are FIVE parts to it.) I believe that Jews are just like everybody else. If you’re a long-time reader, you know that I say the same thing about every single identifiable group – all any of us want to do is come home at the end of the day, kiss the ones we love, get something to eat, sleep somewhere safe and live our lives.

And yet, I live in a country where the president hates me for being Jewish. For how I was born. Because he is like his father, who marched proudly with the Klan in New York in 1927. Not kidding, and he was arrested for it. He adores the “White Nationalists” who, if history is any guide, are spiritually aligned with the Aryans and the Third Reich. If that doesn’t make you think the Orange Slug is akin to Hitler, you haven’t been paying attention.

I still disdain identity politics. In large part because I believe that we all must stand up for one another. So when you look at the image on the left, replace “Communists, Jews, Trade Unionists, Catholics” with anything you like…Hispanics, Trans People, African-Americans…it doesn’t matter what you pick because the fundamental idea is the same — we must stand up as one against the Nazi evil that is the Trumpkin Regime and its minions. When they’re done filing up the camps at the border with all the asylum seekers they can find, they’ll start rounding up the activists, and then the media, and they’ll move on to everyone else who isn’t “pure enough.” You don’t have to believe me, just wait and watch. Or better yet — STAND UP — and, of course, Vote November 5th and vanquish every single Republican. Because the one identity I DO know is that if you are a Republican, you stand with the haters.

 

Posted in Anti-Semitism, Donald Trump, The Politics of Hate | Comments Off on Jewish in America: 2019

Music, Protests and Identity Politics: Reflections on a Theme

This past weekend marked the 50th anniversary of Woodstock. You knew that. W-XPN played the concert, stage whispers and all, for the entirety of the production You probably knew that, too. You may or may not know that I didn’t attend Woodstock because even though my cousin Steve got to go, and offered me a ride, my dad nailed me in my bedroom so that I couldn’t go. He thought I was too young. And, as an adult, I realize he was completely correct — but I STILL WANTED TO GO!!!!! Thanks, I feel better now.

For some reason, I felt a need to listen to the No Nukes album. That’s from the MSG concerts in 1979 protesting, with music, against nuclear proliferation.

So I am lost in my past…and thinking about what it was to protest then, the issues in play, and in so doing “Identity Politics” finally crystallized in my mind. The idea of “Identity Politics” has never sat well with me because I consider them to be unnecessarily divisive. I understand the idea, that “identity” defines people, but EVERYONE has an identity, and there are hopefully more things that unify us than separate us. Yeah, yeah, I have heard the blow-back that I don’t understand what it is to be African-American, and that’s true.

BUT

I know a lot of men who feel as strongly as I do about a woman’s right to choose, even though they cannot get pregnant. I want them as allies in the fight, not separated because they can pee standing up. The LGBTQIA movement is welcoming to cis, straight people like myself – they see the need for allies.

So, back to the past…in the 80’s, I met a man who shares my birthday. Same date, same year. He pointed out to me that as different as are our backgrounds, our politics, and where we spent our youth, we share the exact same memory of the days after JFK’s assassination. We saw the same images on TV, in Look and Life, and for kids our age, it was our first multi-day memory. And he was right, then and now. We were little kids, and for most of us, we barely understood the concept of “death”, much less assassination. But we knew our president, we did his exercises from the same “Go you Chicken Fat Go” 45 rpm record that had been sent to every elementary school classroom throughout the country the year before. We all, young and old, felt the same sense of loss. Of horror. Used to be that “the president” was the president of all the people, all the country.

And then the war. All of us Americans knew someone who was fighting in Vietnam. A family member, a friend, a neighbor. And all of us either were veterans or had a father, uncle, brother who had fought in WW1, WW2 or Korea. 100% of us. It’s different today when less than half of one percent of the country is active military, meaning that far more Americans see “war” as an abstraction. Back in 1969, war was always close at hand. Shadows of WW2, Korea, and HUAC hung over us. We knew camp survivors tattooed with numbers on their arms. We worried every year when the draft numbers were announced. Who would be called? Who would flee to Canada? And every night on the news….the war led.

“Identity” was a country at war. A wrong war, in the minds of many of us. I remember the first time I really heard about Vietnam. It was 1966. I came home and my dad, a neighbor, and the neighbor’s son were standing out front of our apartment building. The son was a Lieutenant on leave. He was arguing with his dad, saying that he had been to Laos, and knew others who had been to Cambodia. The father was livid, saying that Johnson had denied that we had crossed out of Vietnam. “Serve your county proudly, like I did in WW2,” he said. “You must be mistaken. The president wouldn’t lie.”

My dad and I went inside, and I asked him about it. Years later, he told me that was the first time he questioned what the government said, but he got right on it. He did the investigating he could, but sources were certainly limited. Still, he kept a scrapbook of things that “looked fishy”, and in 1971, we all read The Pentagon Papers, and learned a lot. Innocence lost.

Woodstock came after Tet, and the tide against the war had turned.

This was a weekend of the identity of youth. Of music. Of ostensible joy (in the rain). While not a protest, per say — it was a huge gathering of people of one mind. And then back to the anti-Vietnam protests, of trying to get the voting age lowered to 18, of trying to get abortion legalized. “Earth Day” was just joining the radar – the first would occur the following April. We were all still reeling from the assassinations of RFK and King the year before. Of the riots. The burning cities. Music offered hope, and some temporary escape.

Flash forward ten years.

Vietnam had ended, the voting age had been lowered to 18 (“Old enough to die in Vietnam, old enough to vote against the war”). Nixon had been vanquished. Many of us boomers had committed to careers in public service, in rebuilding the country, and now we had the threat of nuclear war. The No Nukes concerts raised money to fight nuclear proliferation. Many of us were part of a worldwide chain meditating daily against nuclear war. Three Mile Island had melted down in March, the concerts were in September. Far from war, yet the threat of death so close. Again, “identity” was staying alive, preventing death from colorless poison. Earth Day was 9 years old. We didn’t know about plastics.

And now today. 50 years since Woodstock. 40 years since No Nukes. I still go to protests, still celebrate Earth Day — and I actually still listen to the same music I listened to 40 – 50 years ago. And I wonder about “identity” at the events. I see people of all shapes and sizes and ages and colors and “identities” at them….the “identity” being anti-gun, anti-Mariner East, pro-choice, pro-women’s rights…and the list goes on. I like protests.

Still, people tell me that I don’t understand. That I CANNOT understand. That I don’t know how privileged I am. Do I know I’m privileged? Sure — I live indoors, with potable water, indoor plumbing, electricity, and enough money that everyone who lives with me can eat every day.  And that makes me “rich” in Trump’s America. Do I know that I can speed while driving and that there is no price for “driving while white?” Yup, sure do.

But do I understand hate crimes? Sure do. I was the victim of a hate crime about 25 years ago – the kind that the FBI investigates. The kind where the local cops took me out on a shooting range, put a gun in my hands so I could fire it, and advised me to carry a gun. Okay, to be honest, that was their recommendation BEFORE I fired the gun. Then they saw how that wasn’t really an option (you have to keep your eyes open, and not fall backwards from the power of the shot….they ended up recommending a dog….they recognized that I was never going to be able to shoot a gun). In all seriousness, it was terrifying that someone wanted me dead because I was Jewish. Until he was caught, I needed to have someone with me all the time: a professional who did carry a gun (and could use it). I extrapolate to the people who are just as fearful because many people want to kill them. I understand the fear and the worry, even though I don’t share their identity. But still I empathize and sympathize with the recipients of hate. I’m told this is not “good enough.”

Like too many women to count, I know the pain of cracked ribs and a fractured skull at the hands of a man who ostensibly loved her. I am “privileged” that I was done with him after the first bad act. I didn’t have to stay. I had enough sense of self to realize it was him and not me. And yet, I know that a man can be falsely accused. And so, I’m not “#MeToo” enough for the purists.

I was a doctor for decades. I believe in universal access to GOOD (patient-centric) healthcare for everyone. And it’s not an abstraction to me: I donated time to treat patients at a clinic who couldn’t pay, and signed my paycheck over to the clinic as soon as they handed it to me. I treated patients in my private practice who couldn’t pay because I’d taken an oath. But I’m told that’s “not good enough” because I cannot currently sign on to Medicare for All as the next step, only the as the ultimate outcome with interim steps.

There is a protest going on now in Harlan County, KY. It involves coal, a train, dedicated families, and a bad company. They’re set up a tent city to block the train with the million dollars worth of coal that it owed to them. Really. I’m thinking of going with a young man – a good kid, he is. Dedicated and passionate about making the world a better place. I’ve been trying to teach him what I know because that’s the job of a old political activist…pass it on! And those 10 hours each way in the car could be a whole bunch of chat and learning….and he’d try (again) to sell me on aspirational politics…sigh.

Anyway – here’s the difference between being a pre-teen wanting to attend Woodstock and today — I am as dedicated to saving the world as I ever have been. Maybe more so because I see a danger today that didn’t exist in the past. I’m happy to do the drive. I have more money than I did when I was twelve, so I can afford to bring supplies to tent city. But, and here’s the thing about “50 years” — the heart and soul are all in. The body needs a hotel reservation because these bones can no longer sleep on the ground.

 

 

 

 

Posted in Identity Politics, Music, Rant | Comments Off on Music, Protests and Identity Politics: Reflections on a Theme

Sunday with the Senators: Let’s Talk Maine

I have a gut feeling that we can retake the Senate. One of the seats that is definitely on my list is Maine. So let’s take a deep dive into that race…as you certainly know, the incumbent is anti-choice, Bret-Kavanaugh-enabler Susan Collins, who has held her seat since 1997. On the plus side, as I’ve pointed out many times before, she makes great blueberry muffins and passes them out at constituent events. And um…..that’s it, the upside is the muffins.

On the other side, she’s just plain bad news. She wasn’t always this way, but she’s now. She’s got a primary challenger in Derek Levasseur, He’s challenging from the right and says that Collins isn’t supporting Trumpkin enough. He launched a few months ago and has raised about $7,000. At first, I thought I read it wrong and he raised $7 million, but then I put my glasses on and saw it’s $7 thousand. All of that money is from individuals who gave less than $200 each — on the bright side for him, that translates into votes. On the downside, he spent all the money and is now $2 grand in the hole.

Collins, meanwhile, has about $5.5 million CoH, and receives about a quarter of her funding from PACs. But is money everything? Her polling is fascinating. she is now the second lowest polling Senator. The only Senator hated more than she is #MoscowMitch. Read all the juicy details here. But let’s say she gets through the primary, she’ll still need to face a Democrat, and, this being Maine, some third party folks. And remember, Maine has ranked voting.

Remember that whoever wins the Democratic Party receives a minimum of $4 million. Back when it was theoretically questionable whether Collins would be the deciding vote on Kavanaugh, Maine People’s Alliance, Mainers for Accountable Leadership and activist Ady Barkan set up a fundraiser on the platform Crowdpac, You can still donate at Fund Susan Collins’ Future Opponent. So who are the choices?

The biggest name is Sara Gideon, who is the current Speaker of the Maine House and thus has a lot of name recognition and the support of outside groups, and has raised about a million so far.  Those groups include the DSCC, NARAL and EMILY’S List. Gideon is the one to beat, and the most likely winner.

Next is Betsy Sweet, with about $60,000 CoH. She has been an advocate for Women’s issues, and was eliminated in the 2018 Democratic gubernatorial primary.

And then there is Bre “Bee Kay” Kidman. She’s got about $5 grand CoH. And here is her background:

“A local attorney, activist, performance artist, burlesque dancer, founding member of M.E.S.H. Portland, and runnerup to Best Public Intellectual (as voted in the Phoenix’s 2018 Best of Portland Readers’ Poll), Kidman has taken on a new epithet this fall, releasing the raw and visceral electro/industrial pop album under the alias Bee Kay Esq” I am not making this up.

There is not a lot of daylight between their positions. All three are running on center-left platforms, with both Sweet and Kidman being a bit more left than Gideon. But Gideon has both the infrastructure and the institutional support. Gideon is not centrist enough to face a challenge from the Justice Democrats or related groups, and it’s doubtful that those challenges would play well given the demographics of Maine. It is the oldest state in the nation, and facing the kind of problems other states will also follow as their populations age. The only overall solution to those problems relate to increasing younger populations and providing them with living wage jobs. So, we’re talking immigration, given the abysmal birth rate nationwide. Thus, the campaign going forward will be related to bread-and-butter issues. Gideon’s solutions are the most realistic, and salable, to the electorate.

The sole general election poll so far is from June, and while it shows Collins over Gideon 44 – 30 (the rest to third party), that poll came from Gravis, which has a C+ rating, and is a Republican pollster, so needs to be taken with a grain of salt. Plus, it’s early. Finally, that poll was accomplished the week that Sara Gideon announced, so there’s no doubt that her numbers will improve as people know she’s running. Granted, we are more than a year out, but hopefully Gideon will clear the bar and win the primary. Barring something out of left field, count this as one more to our tally in January 2021.

 

Posted in Elections, Senate, Sunday with the Senators | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Sunday with the Senators: Let’s Talk Maine

Catching Up with TMess, and a Local Note

I don’t just blog here, I read, too. And over the past few days, TMess has posted some riveting information, and I learned tons! I agree completely with his take on the House (link), and learned about the upcoming international elections (link) which he keeps up with, and the rest of us really should since we’re part of the world. Oh! Canada! Touch blue, make it true (for those of you who remember the 70’s).

But what really fascinated me was his information on the 2020 delegate selection plans. (Link.) The most compelling tidbit related to the changes in how Iowa will calculate its delegates. Far different from how it was through 2016. It will be a real game changer, although the math will be tricky. Remember, folks, that no matter what the national polls say, “All Politics Is Local” and it’s those primaries and caucuses that will lead to the delegate count.

I do, however, take issue with TMess’ numbers. He says that approximately a third of the delegates will be chosen by Super Tuesday. And that’s been true in the past BUT this year is different, as is my math. There are two ways to calculate delegates: one is off the total number of delegates, meaning both pledged delegates and Super Delegates. That number is 4,532. And if that’s how one counts, then “approximately a third” is okay math – the actual number is 35%. HOWEVER, the Super Delegates are not chosen at primaries nor caucuses. They are already delegates. So when you subtract the 764 Super Delegates, math indicated 3,768 pledged delegates, meaning that the actual amount of chosen delegates by Super Tuesday is 42%. Not that much of a difference, but it’s closer to half than a third. Granted, some of the dates might shift, but having both Texas and California as Super Tuesday states is a big deal in terms of pledged delegates allocated. Together, they hold 17% of the pledged delegates.

Kamala Harris is polling well in California, she has that built in home state advantage, although that may change over time. And when you look at Beto O’Rourke (who has suspended his campaign in the face of El Paso, and who really should drop and beat the pants off of Big John at the polls for the Senate seat) he may well smoke everyone else in Texas. Make sure to read TMess delegate article because those are the sort of details that will help you with your score card and making sense of the statewide polls as they change between now and Super Tuesday.

And on a local note….

Last Saturday, I had breakfast with the chair of the local Democratic Party.  In fact, that meeting, attending a protest, trying to kill Lanternflies (I was unsuccessful since I can’t kill, even though they’re very dangerous) and having to work for my regular job over the weekend precluded me from reading TMess’ articles sooner. Sigh. For those of you who don’t live around here, I live in a pivotal purple district outside of Philadelphia.

It was my first sit down with the gentleman. I’d like to start by saying that he’s a nice guy. He’s gracious, and if we were talking “stuff” in lieu of politics, he’d be fun. However, he embodies to my mind what is completely wrong with the Democratic Party at multiple levels. I mentioned to him that when our time was over, I was going over to the “stop Walmart from selling guns” protest. I invited him to join me. He at first claimed that he didn’t have time. I explained that it would be about 20 minutes, and then the cops would show and we would disperse. And that stuck in my craw, not having 20 minutes (about 10 minutes from the restaurant) to stand up and be counted about the murders and massacres. His real reason became more clear as we chatted.

My position is that the Democratic Party stands for something. It’s contained in our platform, which is rewritten and published every four years. If you’re a long time reader, you know how I feel about the platform. His position was that the party shouldn’t take a position ON ANYTHING!!! so that the candidates were free to make their own decisions on where they stand on issues. And therein lies the rub: taking a position, aligning with stated positions, and leading on those positions is what “leaders” at the local, state and national level need to do to make the party itself relevant. Too many voters are disinterested in “the party” because they see no difference between the parties. It’s one of the things that keeps people from actually voting. Sigh. Standing up matters.

Here in our little corner of the world, we have an issue called “the pipeline”. For those of you who don’t live here, for about the past hundred years, oil has been piped from the refineries in and around Philadelphia north and west up to distribution areas further inland in Pennsylvania. About 20 years ago (30 for those in the know) the idea was to build parallel pipelines to carry “bad stuff”, meaning highly volatile gases, from rural Pennsylvania TO Philadelphia where it would be loaded onto ships, sent to Europe and be made into single use plastics. Yeah, if you’re new, read that again. These new pipelines can leak, killing people. The construction of the pipeline is so slipshod that sinkholes open and make houses uninhabitable. All in all VERY BAD.

Over the years, “the party” didn’t take a position on the pipeline. We are Democrats, and if you read our platform, in fact, in EACH AND EVERY platform we’ve ever written and approved, we are against things that kill people. (Yes, I know we’re hazy where war is concerned, but in general, we’re opposed to things that kill people.) Into that vacuum came local Democrats who have taken money, advice and guidance from pro-pipeline PACs and individuals, and have used it to surreptitiously and quietly get municipalities and the county to allow for both easements and construction. That lack of party leadership over decades will end up killing people. It’s already cost multiple families their homes.

The point of being in charge of an organization, be it the smallest local cohort, a national organization, or anything in between, is to LEAD. Setting standards, taking positions, and in the case of the Democratic Party, giving people the REASONS to be Democrats. Things have changed since the 2016 platform, but it does espouse what our party stands for. You can read it here. If you listen to the 2020 presidential candidates, they have different pathways to get to the different elements in the platform, but their positions align in principle and diverge in specifics.

The kindest thing I can say about America today is that it’s a lot like the Twilight Zone. I have no doubt that eventually we will emerge from this Republican darkness – but to be positioned to retake our position as a world leader, we need party leadership at all levels. Not just candidates, but the party itself. If we cannot rebuild the party, we will be unable to attract candidates who will represent our base and our basis. We will end up with Dan Lipinski-types who oppose abortion in all cases, as well as access to health insurance. Into a vacuum always crawl the lowest of the low. I am personally agnostic on whether the party can rebuild itself from within, or will need to be taken over by new blood – but whoever prevails, please, PLEASE, let them be true leaders.

Posted in Delegate Count, Delegates, Democratic Party, Elections, House of Representatives, Money in Politics, Primary Elections, Superdelegates | Comments Off on Catching Up with TMess, and a Local Note

Call the House Back

Since the events of last weekend, a major focus of the press has been whether Moscow Mitch will call the Senate back into session to deal with gun control.  After all, there are several bills that the House has passed regarding background checks, etc., that would be useful starting points for Senate debate.

It has become pretty clear that Moscow Mitch intends to stay in his turtle shell and hope that — as in the past — other issues will gain media attention and the focus on Republican inaction on this issue will pass.  But there is one thing that Democrats can do to highlight the Senate’s failure and that is for the House to return to Washington to take another look at gun control.

Technically, it’s not necessary because — as discussed above — the House has already done its part.  But, unfortunately, the House passed its bills in the ordinary course of business — meaning that the media paid those bills little attention as they were passed.  The purpose of recalling the House into session is not a need to pass new bills (although we should do that as well) but to demonstrate that the House is doing the People’s business while the Senate is standing in the doorway and blocking up the halls (with apologies to Bob Dylan).

So, starting as soon as the House can reconvene, we need big committee hearings at which experts can testify about the rising number of mass shootings by White Nationalists, the lack of any legitimate reason for owning a high capacity magazine, and why gun violence seems to be unique to the United States and to suggest some empirically-proven remedies to gun violence.  Following these hearings — with Democratic leadership holding daily news conferences about the absent Senate and the absent President — the House can pass a new round of bills again followed by press conferences insisting that the Senate take up the bills.

In a period of divided government, the advantage belongs to those who take the initiative and frame the debate.  If Democrats are willing to return to Washington and get back to work, and the Do Nothing Republicans make it clear that they would be anywhere but Washington because they do not want to deal with the need for reasonable gun control, it is possible that the pressure will reach the points when even a Republican Senate leadership that is much better at saying “No” than saying “Yes” will have to finally pass something or face the consequences of their inaction.

Posted in Donald Trump, House of Representatives, Senate | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Call the House Back