Category Archives: Uncategorized

Impeachment Legalese for Non-Lawyers

Over the next several days, the Senate will (potentially) be voting on whether to subpoena individuals to testify in the impeachment trial of President Donald J. Trump.  With the caution that an impeachment trial is not quite like a regular trial that you would see if you headed to your local courthouse, the following are some terms that you may hear from Senators and talking heads during this discussion.

Subpoena — Stripped of its fancy title, a subpoena is an order to a person to appear in court to testify or to turn over documents to the parties.   In most courts, subpoenas issue upon request by a party almost automatically.  If there is a reason why that subpoena is improper, the witness can ask to “quash” (effectively cancel) the subpoena or one of the other parties can ask to exclude the witness.  For an impeachment trial, because the Senate is both judge and jury, the Senate needs to approve the subpoena.

Deposition — A deposition is out-of-court testimony.   The attorneys for the witness get to ask questions just like it was in court and a court reporter takes down the questions and answers.  The court reporter then prepares a transcript (a printed booklet containing all of the questions and answers, word for word).  Often depositions are used either to discover what a witness might say or because the witness is not available for trial.  (Typically, depositions are used for medical witnesses who can make time available after work for a deposition but would be unable to wait in court for their turn to testify without putting patients at risk.)  A deposition also allows parties to decide what part of a witness’s testimony they actually want to use. Continue Reading...

Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Impeachment Legalese for Non-Lawyers

Impeachment History 101 (Part 2)

During this week, we frequently heard from Republicans that the impeachment of Donald Trump was historical because it was partisan and all about politics.  Whether the Republicans knew that this was not true or are living in an alternate reality is impossible to tell (but I assume that at least some of them have some familiarity with history).  But if you want to discuss an impeachment that was all about politics, you need to turn back to the impeachment of Andrew Johnson in 1868.

The events that culminated in the impeachment of Andrew Johnson began in the spring of 1864.  While today, the Union victory over the rebel governments in the South during the Civil War is seen by many as inevitable.  But in 1864, that was not the case.  And the uncertain state of the war bled over into the politics.  Facing potential challenges from the left (with the Radical Republicans considering running their own candidate) and the right (from Anti-war Democrats), Lincoln joined the moderate Republicans and Pro-war Democrats into a National Union Party with Andrew Johnson as the Vice-Presidential candidate.  Of course, by November, the fortunes in the war had changed and the National Union Party won easily.  But after the assassination of Lincoln, Johnson became President and was faced with a Republican majority that had a different vision of reconstruction than Lincoln and Johnson had run on.  If Lincoln had lived, perhaps he would have been able to keep everybody together on the same page or would have supported a more vigorous program of Reconstruction when the former Confederate states tried to get by with the least change possible.  Johnson, however, wasn’t Lincoln, and his refusal to budge led to a bitter 1866 mid-term election in which the terms of Reconstruction was the main issue in the campaign.

After the Radical Republicans won the election of 1866, they decided to force their ideas through (and they had the votes in Congress to do so).  However, Johnson as commander-in-chief was technically the boss of the military that would have the duty of carrying out the Congressional agenda.  So to keep Johnson from interfering, Congress made certain the chain of command went through the Secretary of War and also passed the Tenure in Office Act.  The key provision of the Tenure of Office Act required the Senate to ratify the removal of any cabinet officer before the removal became permanent.  (If the Senate was not in session, the officer was temporarily “suspended” until the Senate made its decision on whether to approve the removal.) Continue Reading...

Also posted in Impeachment | Tagged | Comments Off on Impeachment History 101 (Part 2)

Moulton, Inslee, and Hickenlooper drop out

Rep. Seth Moulton joined Gov, Jay Inslee and Gov. John Hickenlooper in dropping out of the 2020 race. With the much tighter requirements in place for the next debates, and the lure of political offices in their own state for Inslee and Hickenlooper, they saw the writing on the wall. That leaves us 18 major candidates (we’ll add Steyer to the list if he makes a debate), but 8 are in danger of not qualifying for the next debate. Ten candidates have qualified: Biden, Booker, Buttigieg, Castro, Harris, Klobuchar, O’Rourke, Sanders, Warren  and Yang. Steyer needs one more poll > 2%, Gabbard 2, and Gillibrand 3 plus more donors. Williamson, Bennet, Bullock, De Blasio, Delaney and Ryan debate chances are likely done.

Running:

  1. Rep. John Delaney
  2. Sec. Julian Castro
  3. Sen. Elizabeth Warren
  4. Rep. Tulsi Gabbard
  5. Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand
  6. Mayor Pete Buttigieg
  7. Sen. Kamala Harris
  8. Sen. Cory Booker
  9. Sen. Any Klobuchar
  10. Andrew Yang
  11. Sen. Bernie Sanders
  12. Rep. Beto O’Rourke
  13. Rep. Tim Ryan
  14. Sen. Michael Bennet
  15. VP Joe Biden
  16. Gov. Steve Bullock
  17. Mayor Bill De Blasio
  18. Marianne Williamson

Out: Continue Reading...

Comments Off on Moulton, Inslee, and Hickenlooper drop out

Let’s Talk Drugs!

There is a lot of discussion about “Medicare for All” nowadays. Most people don’t realize that “Medicare for All” is not a thing, but rather a variety of different pieces of legislation and plans that work in different ways. They also overlook that close to 100% of current Medicare participants have, in addition to Medicare, either supplementary insurance or Medicaid, because Medicare in its current form doesn’t cover everything, nor does it pay enough to providers to cover their costs. In addition, many Medicare participants have a specific drug plan, or their formulary is rolled into their Medicare Advantage plan.

Over time, I’m going to cover different aspects of changing our medical care provision and payment options, because there are a lot of moving parts, and much to understand. Today’s topic is drugs.

When you talk to people about what they hate about healthcare today, their biggest concerns relate to the cost of things. And at the top of the list of costs are drugs – especially for those millions of people who take non-generic drugs. One of the biggest complaints is about insulin, which you would think was a generic, but well, it’s actually spelled “insu — American-Pharma-Benefit-Manager-Greed — lin”. Continue Reading...

Tagged , , | Comments Off on Let’s Talk Drugs!

Why I am Leaving my Indivisible Group

There are a host of reasons that I’ll detail, but in a word: “Facebook”.

In November and December of 2016, I received literally hundreds of phone calls, texts, emails and knocks at my door all saying essentially the same thing.

“You know how I told you for the past 20 years that I didn’t have the two hours you asked for to stand Voter Registration, or canvass or phone bank? Well, I have time now.” Continue Reading...

Tagged | Comments Off on Why I am Leaving my Indivisible Group

A Warning to California Voters

Hey Californians….do you know you might miss the opportunity to vote your presidential choice in the 2020 primary? Read on, my friends.

California has what’s called a “jungle primary” system. That means that, in most cases, all the candidates from all the parties appear on all the ballots. The two highest vote-getters progress to the General, even if they are members of the same party. There is one exception: President of the United States.

The State passed the Voter’s Choice Act in 2016, to make voting easier. Each county sends every registered voter a ballot ahead of each election. Voters can mail in their ballot, drop it off, early vote or vote on Election Day. Good so far, right? We love ballot access! But the issue is who will be on your ballot? Continue Reading...

Tagged , , | Comments Off on A Warning to California Voters

Honor and Idiocy

I awoke this morning to two things: Justin Amash has left the Republican Party. Great respect for what he did. Nine more and we won’t all turn to salt.

The second thing was a post on a Facebook feed I normally don’t read. The woman was talking about “Illegal Immigrants”. While working to comprise a response that didn’t include the words “racist” “idiot” “moron” “troll” etc., I flashed back to last summer, when I spoke at an immigration rally.

At that rally, I had the opportunity to use a line I’d formulated in my mind earlier. Of every line in every speech I’ve ever given, it was my favorite. Here it is: Continue Reading...

Tagged , , | Comments Off on Honor and Idiocy

blowing up the 4th

In general, I LOVE the 4th of July. It celebrates the adoption by the Continental Congress of one of Thomas Jefferson’s greatest pieces: The Declaration of Independence.

The Declaration was the first formal statement, by a people, asserting their right to choose their own government. Read that again. The Declaration was the first formal statement, by a people, asserting their right to choose their own government.

We were, with the Declaration, and again with the US Constitution, a nation of firsts. I like to go to the National Constitution Center. One of my pick fave things to do is to go up to the second floor, to the front of the building, out onto the balcony, and look south across Independence Mall, to Independence Hall, where the Constitution was written. I think of the men who negotiated and finally agreed to this marvel that made us a country of laws. They were guilty of treason against the Crown, as America was still part of Great Britain. They, and all the men, women and children who stood up, offered their lives so that going forward, we could breathe free. Continue Reading...

Tagged , , | Comments Off on blowing up the 4th

What About Our Children?

When Matt started DCW back in 2005, the world was a different place in so many ways. When Oreo and I joined him a couple years later the world had such promise.

I’ve been thinking back recently as I watch the 2020 campaigns unfold. And I’m thinking about our kids who were so cute and little back then – close to adults now. And the grandkid who wasn’t even a twinkle in his parents’ eyes back then. I think about “we bloggers” and our readership and what we are leaving our kids and their kids…cue the popcorn, and settle in, this is going to take a while.

First, a shout out to TMess who keeps posting here about what the courts are doing. I so appreciate his work, as his posts are both deep and informative, and in certain ways, the courts are all we really have left unless we pull it together. Continue Reading...

Tagged , | Comments Off on What About Our Children?

Garcetti Out

OK, we’re actually starting to see some real winnowing. Garcetti was a Tier 3 candidate, ranked somewhere like 12-18th on various lists. It’s drops like this that will be the difference between 14 and 24 candidates for the first debate. We still have 8 announced candidates, with 20 still to hear from.

Definitely running:

  1. Rep. John Delaney
  2. Sec. Julian Castro
  3. Gov. Jay Inslee
  4. Sen. Elizabeth Warren
  5. Rep. Tulsi Gabbard
  6. Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand
  7. Mayor Pete Buttigieg
  8. Sen. Kamala Harris

Potential candidates who have shown some interest: Continue Reading...

Comments Off on Garcetti Out