Monthly Archives: August 2019

International Elections — Summer and Fall 2019

With Congress out until Moscow Mitch deigns to call the Senate back to endless debate gun control legislation before ultimately passing the most minimal bill that the Republicans think they can get away with, it’s a good opportunity to talk about the politics of our allies.

The biggest one for domestic politics is probably the Israeli election.  A mere four months ago, Israel went to the polls and Benjamin Netanyahu eked out a narrow victory.  However, given that Israel uses proportional representation, coming in first is not enough to be prime minister.  And many of the groups that would naturally support a Netanyahu government have conflicting non-negotiable demands.  (The big dispute on the Israeli right is between secular and religious parties.  Current Israeli law exempts religious students from the draft.  The religious parties want to keep this exemption.  The secular parties want to repeal this exemption.)  Because he could not put together a majority behind a unified agenda, Israel is going to have a second election on September 17.  Again, like our own President, Netanyahu has to face allegations of improprieties and could likely be facing criminal charges if he loses.  One of the interesting factors in Israeli politics is the use of joint lists in which various parties agree to run as one list to assure meeting the threshold for winning seats (and to maximize the seats won) with internal agreements based on estimated support determining how any seats won are allocated between the parties.  Not much has changed since April so another narrow Netanyahu win is the most likely result.

In Europe, there are a lot of elections set for the smaller economies — Portugal, Poland, Austria, Croatia — but the big question is the United Kingdom.  After the recent Conservative Party elections, Boris Johnson is serving as Prime Minister, but when Parliament returns from the summer recess the Conservatives and their allies from Northern Ireland will have a 320-319 majority.  However, the United Kingdom is currently scheduled to leave the European Union on Halloween.  Boris Johnson is the new Prime Minister because Theresa May could not negotiate a deal for the departure that could obtain the consent of Parliament.  While Johnson is trying to negotiate a new deal, the European Union is not willing to negotiate against itself.  It made concessions in the negotiations with Ms. May and is not willing to agree to move the goalposts (especially as the main problem is the Ireland-Northern Ireland border).  There is a solid bloc of the Conservative Party that is opposed to departing without a deal which could lead to Mr. Johnson losing a “no confidence” vote when Parliament reconvenes.  If there is not a consensus alternative to lead a “national unity”government, early elections (but no sooner than October 31) are likely.  Given that the predominant issue in the UK remains the relation between the UK and the European Union (and that the UK is split down the middle on this issue) and the use of a first-past-the-post system (which means the fact that there are multiple parties on both sides of the divide can lead to weird results in individual constituencies). Continue Reading...

Posted in Elections | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on International Elections — Summer and Fall 2019

2020 Delegate Selection Plans

While it has taken some time to get plans from all of the states and territories, it appears that all of the delegate selection plans for 2020 have now been sent to the Rules and By-laws Committee (you may remember them from 2008) for review.  One of the key issues for this current set of plans has been how many caucus states there will be for 2020.

Caucuses have been a catch 22 for both sides of the establishment vs. activist debate.  On the one hand, the caucus system rewards organization which — at least in the past — gave an edge to the establishment.  On the other hand, in recent cycles, caucuses reward the candidates with the most enthusiastic supporters — which has tended to be the candidates supported by grass roots progressive activists.  On the third hand, the advantage for the activists come from a system that puts obstacles in the place of broad participation — so, while that system, benefits progressive activists, the basic structure is contrary to some basic principles that progressives hold.   As a result, the rules changes after the 2016 cycle were definitely designed to promote movement away from caucuses and to encourage those that remained to take steps to increase participation, and those changes have had an effect.

In 2016, thirty-seven states and two territories (D.C. and Puerto Rico) had government-run primaries.  Democrats Abroad had a party-run primary.  Finally, thirteen states and four territories held a variation on a caucus — some more open than others. Continue Reading...

Posted in 2020 Convention, 2020DNC, Delegates | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on 2020 Delegate Selection Plans

Ranked Choice Voting and the Senate

Earlier today, DocJess posted the first Sunday with the Senators of this cycle.  I am posting this follow-up on the weird features of Maine election law that could determine whether there is a Democratic majority in 2020.

In Maine, for federal elections, there is ranked choice voting — both for the general election and the primary.  While we do not yet know the full list of candidates who will be running in 2020, my hunch is that ranked choice voting probably hurts Senator Collins in the primary but may help her in the general election.

My thinking behind this is that a multi-candidate primary field would make it difficult for any candidate to get more first choice votes than Senator Collins.  However, I think that most of the primary challenge to Senator Collins will be from candidates who do not think that she is loyal to the new LePage-Trump version of the Republican Party and see her as a RINO.  The voters who support these candidates are likely to rank Senator Collins last among their choices.  So if Senator Collins only got 45% or so of the first choice votes, there would be a decent chance (assuming that everybody ranked the entire field) that the strongest of her opponents would pass her once all preferences are distributed.  A primary loss by Senator Collins would move the Maine Senate race from lean Republican to likely Democrat. Continue Reading...

Posted in Elections, Primary Elections, Senate | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Sunday with the Senators: Moscow Mitch

After the recent Democratic debates, there was a lot of chatter and whining about Moscow Mitch being the stumbling block to the enactment of any legislation a new Democratic president might want. Cognitive dissonance, kids, they’re missing the point. Moscow Mitch is not assured re-election, nor a Republican Senate. In either of those cases, he becomes a non-issue. So let’s see how we could make that happen.

The current makeup is 53 Republicans, 45 Democrats and two independents who caucus with the Democrats. There are 34 seats up for election, of which 22 are held by the Republicans. Therefore we need to win three seats with a Democratic president, and four if the Orange Menace stays in the White House. Below is a map that shows the “consensus view” of the seats that are up (greyed out states have no contest next year barring resignation or death) and you can click at the bottom of the map and make your own predictions.

Click the map to create your own at 270toWin.com

So here are some thoughts: right now, Beto O’Rourke has an 11 point lead on the giant Cheeto in Texas. He lost to Ted by 2.6 points last year. It’s completely possible that if he gave up the pipe dream of successfully running for president in 2020, he could beat Big John. In Colorado, Cory Gardener’s seat is eminently winnable by John Hickenlooper, and he is not going to make the September debate stage (at last count, he had fewer than 14,000 donors, and polling under 1%). But he could beat Cory. And Mark Kelly (astronaut and husband of Gabby Giffords) has a real shot in the special in Arizona. So, by my math, that’s three. And my fourth is Kentucky. If Amy McGrath can raise $10 million (yeah, you read that right) she can beat Moscow Mitch. It will take a message honed for Kentucky, and an incredible amount of money for a ground game never seen before in the state, but it’s doable. I don’t know how the Maine primary will turn out, but if Sara Gideon takes it, Susan Collins will be able to dedicate more time to making muffins with those blueberries she grows. (And while I hate her politics, I have it on good authority that she makes awesome blueberry muffins and hands them out at constituent events. And yes, sigh, that’s one of those little tidbits you don’t get from the MSM.) Continue Reading...

Posted in Sunday with the Senators | Tagged | Comments Off on Sunday with the Senators: Moscow Mitch

An Elegant Solution to College Debt

There's a proposal floating out there to pay off everyone's student debt. There is a corollary proposal to make college free, but that's another post. No doubt that college is too expensive and that issue needs to be solved, but let's take a look at some far better solutions than a government payout.

Let's look at some numbers:

Posted in Student Loan Debt | Tagged , | Comments Off on An Elegant Solution to College Debt

Overall Thoughts on the July Debates

Wow! Night two was a completely different event from night one. The favoritism in CNN’s development of how they would ask questions, and to whom, was there for all to see. Next up, ABC, and I hope they pick a more equitable format.

The debates showed the schisms in our big tent. And that would be really great in normal times, when the policy differences would end up being hashed out for the platform, and we would find confluence and concurrence. These are not normal times. Meaning that, for example, Gabbard’s take down of Harris’s record in great detail was written down by Trump’s campaign team, where the salient names and dates will be added to the list, and if she is the nominee, they’ll use flash cards with pictures, and it will be used against her. Those historical comments are now the lens that will be used in evaluating any of Harris’ criminal justice policies.

It’s also obvious that no one really knows how to sell a health care plan, other than Sanders. I’m personally not a fan of his plan, as written, I think there are better approaches to get to the eventual goal, but he is able to explain things in simple terms, where others cannot. And for every single candidate pushing Medicare for All in ANY form, how is it that they cannot say the following? Continue Reading...

Posted in Democratic Debates | Comments Off on Overall Thoughts on the July Debates