-
Recent Posts
Search
Welcome to DCW
Upcoming Events
7/15/24 - GOP Convention
TBD - Democratic Convention
11/5/24 - Election DayTools
Archives
Tag Cloud
2008 Democratic National Convention 2012 Democratic National Convention 2012 Republican National Convention 2016 Democratic National Convention 2016 Republican National Convention 2020 Census 2020 Delegate Selection Plans 2020 Democratic Convention 2024 Democratic Convention 2024 Republican Convention Abortion Affordable Care Act Alabama Arizona Bernie Sanders California Delegate Selection Donald Trump First Amendment Florida Free Exercise Clause Free Speech Georgia Hillary Clinton Immigration Iowa Joe Biden John Kasich Kansas Maine Marco Rubio Michigan Missouri Nevada North Carolina Ohio Pennsylvania redistricting Supreme Court Ted Cruz Texas United Kingdom Virginia Voting Rights Act WisconsinDCW in the News
Blog Roll
Site Info
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- DocJess on GOP convention plans remain in flux
- tmess2 on Dems prepare for virtual voting by delegates
- DocJess on GOP Jacksonville money woes continue
- DocJess on Dems prepare for virtual voting by delegates
- tmess2 on GOP now looking at outdoor Jacksonville convention
Archives
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- November 2014
- September 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- March 2014
- January 2014
- August 2013
- August 2012
- November 2011
- August 2011
- January 2011
- May 2010
- January 2009
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
Categories
- 2019-nCoV
- 2020 Convention
- 2020 General Election
- 2020DNC
- 2024 Convention
- 2028 Convention
- Anti-Semitism
- Bernie Sanders
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Civil Rights
- Cleveland
- Climate Change
- Coronavirus
- Coronavirus Tips
- COVID-19
- Debates
- Delegate Count
- Delegates
- Democratic Debates
- Democratic Party
- Democrats
- DemsinPhilly
- DemsInPHL
- Disaster
- DNC
- Donald Trump
- Economy
- Elections
- Electoral College
- Federal Budget
- Freedom of the Press
- General Election Forecast
- GOP
- Healthcare
- Hillary Clinton
- Holidays
- Hotels
- House of Representatives
- Houston
- Identity Politics
- Impeachment
- Iowa Caucuses
- Jacksonville
- Joe Biden
- Judicial
- LGBT
- Mariner Pipeline
- Merrick Garland
- Meta
- Milwaukee
- Money in Politics
- Music
- National Security
- Netroots Nation
- New Yor
- New York
- NH Primary
- Notes from Your Doctor
- NoWallNoBan
- Pandemic
- Philadelphia
- PHLDNC2016
- Platform
- Politics
- Polls
- Presidential Candidates
- Primary and Caucus Results
- Primary Elections
- Public Health
- Rant
- Republican Debates
- Republicans
- Resist
- RNC
- Russia
- Senate
- Snark
- Student Loan Debt
- Sunday with the Senators
- Superdelegates
- Syria
- The Politics of Hate
- Uncategorized
- Vaccines
- War
- Weekly White House Address
Meta
Tag Archives: Nevada
Virtual Voting and the 2020 Nomination
As Doc Jess noted yesterday, the Rules and By-Laws Committee (the party entity with responsibility for reviewing state party delegate selection plans) has found problems with the virtual caucus proposed by Iowa. The concerns, however, extend beyond Iowa. According to news reports, the RBC has also made a similar decision concerning Nevada’s delegate selection rules.
As I noted several weeks ago, there are now seven states left that do not use a state-run primary with Iowa, Nevada, and Wyoming being the last pure caucus states and Alaska, Hawaii, Kansas, and North Dakota using party-run primaries. In the revised delegate selection rules, Rule 2.G suggested that the RBC would consider plans that allowed internet voting as a form of absentee voting if the proposed plan included sufficient security assurances. In its recent decision, the RBC apparently decided that — under current conditions — such assurances are not possible. It is, however, understandable why Iowa and Nevada put forth proposals that relied on internet voting. Rule 2.K.8 requires that parties using a party-run process create some alternative means of voting for those who are unable to participate in person on the day established for the caucus/party-run primary.
In light of these two provisions in the national rules, it’s not just Iowa that has included the possibility of electronic voting. The draft plans in Alaska, Iowa, and Nevada include provisions for electronic voting. The plans in Hawaii and North Dakota opted to use mail-in voting instead of electronic voting. (Alaska’s plan also includes absentee voting, so they might just need to eliminate the electronic voting.) The plan in Kansas notes absentee/advanced voting as a possibility without further details. If I am reading their plan correctly, Wyoming permits surrogate voting (which looks to be a proxy vote permitted in limited circumstances). (I am not sure that proxy voting is allowed by the national rules — although it looks like Wyoming has used it previously from the comments submitted on their plan. However, Wyoming’s plan has other problems that will probably require them to redraft their plans.)
Posted in 2020 Convention, Delegates
Also tagged Alaska, Caucus, Iowa, Party-run Primary, Rules and By-laws Committee
Comments Off on Virtual Voting and the 2020 Nomination
Delegate Selection Rules — Nevada
The tour of the draft plans from 2020 caucus states continues this week with Nevada’s draft plan. For 2020, as it has been for the last several cycles, Nevada — along with Iowa — is one of the two caucus states in the “carve-out period” prior to Super Tuesday. Most of the caucus states — other than potentially Washington — are small states which means that, after Super Tuesday, their influence is at the margin with most of the attention going to the large primary states. However, the four carve-out states each have about a week of national attention giving them a significant role in narrowing the field.
In looking at the draft plans for the caucus states, there have been two major issues that the states have had to address in light of changes to Rule 2.K of the DNC Delegate Selection Rules. First, what procedures does the state intend to take to increase participation in the caucuses? Second, how are the votes at the caucuses translated into the allocation of delegates?
As to the first issue, the 2016 plan in Nevada — recognizing that casino and hotel employees in Las Vegas form a significant bloc of potential caucus participants and that the 24-7 nature of that business would mean that some would-be participants would be working during the time set for the precinct caucuses — also scheduled at-large caucuses at a different time from the regular caucuses to allow shift workers to attend a caucus at a time that did not conflict with their job along with tele-caucuses for those in the military. The plan assigned each of the at-large caucuses a number of delegates based on expected participation at that location and two delegates to the tele-caucus.
Posted in 2020 Convention, Delegates, Primary Elections
Also tagged 2020 Delegate Selection Plans, caucuses, Preferential Voting
Comments Off on Delegate Selection Rules — Nevada
2018 Mid-term Election — Rocky Mountains
While it’s not an exact East-West line, the Rocky Mountain region has seen a lot of change in recent years. While not the same in every state, the southern part of the region has trended a little more toward the Democrats while the northern part has, maybe, gotten even redder.
In Montana, we have a weird combination of races. For Senate, even with President Trump firing with both barrels due to Senator Tester shooting down Trump’s misguided cronyism at the Department of Veteran’s Affair, Senator Tester seems to have a somewhat comfortable lead in the Senate race. On the other hand, WWE-wannabe Greg Gianforte seems to be holding on (by a less comfortable margin) in the U.S. House race.
In Wyoming, the Democrats really have very little chance at picking up any of the races. A successful outcome would be holding the Republicans beneath 55% in any of the three main races.
Colorado is moving from purple to lean Democrat. It looks like Jared Polis has a solid lead in the race for governor. Right now, the Republicans have four of the seven house seats. It looks like the Democrats are likely to gain at least one seat (Sixth District) and are only slight underdogs to gain a second seat (Third District).
New Mexico like Colorado is gradually becoming blue. The mid-term environment allowed the Republicans to win the race for Governor in 2010 and 2014, but, with an open seat this time, it looks very likely to be a Democratic pick-up. And with two Congressmen running for governor, the Democrats are solid favorites to hold their two seats and a very narrow underdog to sweep the state and pick-up the Republicans only seat.
Arizona is the big question mark of the election. Once the bastion of traditional conservatism, the Republican Party has had to try to skirt the fence between traditional Republicanism and the new far right nationalism represented by Trump. This impossible task has created an open Senate seat when Jeff Flake saw the tea leaves on the wall for the Republican primary. While not a sure thing (as the Republicans are throwing every piece of dirt along with the kitchen sink), Arizona is the best opportunity right now for the Democrats to gain a Senate seat. On the other hand, the incumbent Governor seems to have threaded the needle and should win re-election barring a very strong Hispanic turnout. Arizona’s House delegation is currently 5-4 in favor of the Republicans. However, the Democrats are likely to flip that by picking up the Second District. There are two longer shots. The interesting story in Arizona is the Fourth District where the Republican candidate is so outrageous that his own family has cut ads against him. Unfortunately, that district is so red that Satan himself could win running as a Republican.
Moving north, Utah is the home of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, and the church has a large influence over state politics. The Mormons have had some trouble with Trump’s unrepentant bigotry and sexism. (Not that the Church itself has not had a history of having trouble with those issues, but it has made effort to improve its language if not its practices.) It looks like the Republicans will be sending Mitt Romney to the Senate to pester Trump. In the House, the Republicans drew the district lines to split the Democratic strength in the Salt Lake City area into two districts. Even with lines favoring Republicans, the Democrats are slight favorites to take the Fourth District back (which would give them a grand total of one seat in Utah).
Everything is on the line in Nevada. In the Summer of 2017, Senator Dean Heller looked like the most vulnerable Senate Republican. Unlike Senator Flake, Senator Heller managed to have state leaders convince potential primary challengers to find another race. Nevada is really two states. You have three districts in the southern half of the state (all taking in part of the Las Vegas area) and one district covering the northern half of the state. The Democrats currently control all three of the Las Vegas area seats (some by narrow margins) and the Republicans dominate the rest of the state. The Congressional delegation seems likely to stay the same. On the other hand, both of the state-wide races are too close to call with Republicans having a narrow lead. Again, this race is likely to come down to turnout. If the hotel unions in Las Vegas can get their members to vote, Democrats might sweep at the state level. If not, the Republicans will likely escape by the skin of their teeth. The Senate race is the second best chance for a Democratic gain, and it is hard to see how we get to 51 without winning Nevada. It’s possible, just not likely.
Finally, there is Idaho. Two House seats and the Governor’s race. All currently held by Republicans. Getting to 40% in any of the races would be a moral victory for Democrats.
Looking at referendums, Arizona has two interesting referendums that are likely to boost turnout on both sides. On the one hand, there is a proposal to prevent future tax hikes on services. On the other hand, there is a proposal to require Arizona to have renewable energy represent 50% of the state’s energy by 2030. Colorado has a slew of referendums including changes to campaign finance law, establishing redistricting commissions, and limits on fracking. Idaho does have a Medicaid expansion proposition as does Montana. Montana also has a proposal to limit who can collect ballots. (I don’t know if this is a problem in Montana, but it is in some parts of the country where some political organizations pressure voters to apply for and mail in absentee ballots for the organization’s candidates.) Nevada has a renewable energy proposition as well as a motor voter proposal. Utah has a trifecta of progressive proposals — Medicaid expansion, medical marijuana, and a redistricting commission.
In short, this region has only a handful of Democratic pick-up opportunities in the House — two probable and maybe two or three others. On the other hand, it does have two potential pick-ups in Governor races, and three key Senate races with a potential net gain of two Senate seats for the Democrats which are key to the Democrat’s chance at winning control of the Senate.
Posted in Elections, General Election Forecast
Also tagged 2108 Mid-term elections, Arizona, Colorado, Governor, Idaho, Medicaid Expansion, Medical Marijuana, Montana, New Mexico, redistricting, Renewable Energy, U.S. House, U.S. Senate, Utah, Wyoming
Comments Off on 2018 Mid-term Election — Rocky Mountains
Primary Season — Late Spring
Because each state gets to set its own primary date, primary season is a gradual thing. Putting aside a handful of exceptions (and run-offs), most primaries fall into two clusters. The first cluster occurs in May and June (starting on May 8 and ending on June 26). The second cluster occurs in August and September (starting on August 2 and ending on September 13). During both clusters, most primaries occur on Tuesday, and there is at least one state on each Tuesday (other than May 29).
On May 8, there are primaries in Indiana, North Carolina, Ohio, and West Virginia. Key primaries are the Republican Senate primary in Indiana and West Virginia. Both are states won by Trump in which Democratic Senators are running for re-election. In Indiana, you have three candidates running for the Republican nomination. It’s not clear that it really matters who wins or that there is much difference between the candidates. West Virginia is a different matter. The Republicans are scared to death that Don Blankenship could get the nomination. Blankenship is the former CEO of one of the state’s larger coal miner and did time in prison related to miners who died due to unsafe mining practices. The national GOP has (through super-pacs) been running adds against Blankenship. In Ohio, the key races are for Governor with both parties having primaries in the race to replace term-limited John Kasich and Ohio’s 12th District in which there is both a regular primary and a special election primary (most of the candidates are the same in both, so both parties should have the same winner for both primaries, but there is always the chance in a close race that there could be a split result).
On May 15, there are primaries in Idaho, Nebraska, Oregon, and Pennsylvania. The big story is likely to be the new congressional districts in Pennsylvania. Amazingly, there are no incumbent against incumbent primaries although there could be an incumbent against incumbent general election. Given the newness of the lines, it will be interesting to see how the local interests will influence the candidates chosen.
On May 22, there are primaries in Arkansas, Georgia, and Kentucky, and a run-off in Texas. In Texas, there are key run-offs on the Democratic side for Governor and the Seventh District. In both contests, the Republicans will be favored but Democrats have a shot. The question for local Democrats will be whether to go with the “purer” candidate ideologically or with the candidate who could win over college-educated Republicans who do not like being part of the Party of Trump.
June 5 is the big day with primaries in Alabama, California, Iowa, Mississippi, Montana, New Jersey, New Mexico, and South Dakota. California is the tough one to call given its “first two system.” Particularly in close districts, it matters how many strong candidates each party has. In a district (or state-wide for the Democrats) that your party should win, you want a second strong candidate so that you can lock the other party out of the general. If you are slightly behind in the district, you want one strong candidate to assure yourself of a place in the general (and hope that the other party nominate a divisive candidate that gives you a chance to pick up independents and moderates). What you don’t want is three strong candidates which create the possibility (as has happened in the past) that your party could get the most primary votes but still not finish in the top two due to your vote being split too much. (Districts where Democrats could find themselves locked out of the general include the 1st, 4th, 8th, 10th, 39th, 48th, 49th, 50th. The last three are districts that would be targets in November if a Democrat makes it to the final two.) Particularly with Governor being an open seat, the other big question will be whether the Democrats can get both of the general election slots (as they did for Senate in 2016) for Governor and Senate. (The primaries in Mississippi do not include the special election for Senate which will be a “non-partisan” race in November with a run-off if nobody wins a majority.)
June 12 has primaries in Maine, North Dakota, Nevada, South Carolina, and Virginia. In Maine, you have an open race for Governor. In Nevada, you have an open race for Governor and two congressional seats (3rd and 4th). In Virginia, Republicans have a three-way Senate race. You also have an open seat in Virginia 6th and a very important Democratic primary in District 10 which will be a target race in November.
June 19 is the calm week with the only certain primary being for D.C. but the chance at a run-off in Arkansas.
The spring primaries end on June 26 with contests in Colorado, Maryland, New York (federal offices only), Oklahoma, and Utah. There could be a run-off in Mississippi, North Carolina (depending on whether any of the federal offices need a run-off), and/or South Carolina. In Colorado, Governor is an open seat. Additionally, the 2nd District will be an open seat as the Democratic incumbent is running for governor and the 5th District might be an open seat as the incumbent Republican failed to get enough signatures on his petition. (That issue is still being fought in court.) In New York, the interesting race might be the Republican Primary for the 11th district where disgraced former Congressman Michael Grimm is challenging incumbent Congressman Daniel Donovan. In Utah, the big race is the open seat for the U.S. Senate where Mitt Romney is hoping/expecting to do better with primary voters than he did at the Republican state convention with activists.
While technically not a primary, the special election (as in Mississippi, Texas special elections are nominally non-partisan with a run-off in nobody wins) for Texas’s 27th District will take place on June 30. All four of the candidates who will compete in the run-offs on May 22 are on the ballot for the special election. (Whether anybody will drop out after May 22 is to be seen, but you could have the unusual result that a candidate loses on May 22 but makes it to the run-off in the special election due to cross-over votes.)
There could also be run-offs in some states in July depending upon the results in the primaries noted above.
Posted in Democrats, Elections, GOP, House of Representatives, Senate
Also tagged California, Colorado, Don Blankenship, Indiana, Maine, Mid-term elections, Mitt Romney, New York, Ohio, Pennyslvania, Primaries, Texas, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia
1 Comment
Election Night 2016 — What to Look For (Part Four)
As 9:00 p.m. rolls around, enough states have been closed long enough that exit polls become less significant, and raw vote count becomes more significant. If the exit polls and early returns in the state had been clear enough, those states would have already been called. The question at this point in time is which if any of the contested states and races have been called. While enough states remain that technically nobody will have yet won the White House, or the majority in the Senate, or the majority in the House, it should be becoming clear whether it is simply a matter of waiting for the polls to close in “safe” states or if it is going to be a long night waiting for the last votes in a handful of states. While the race is not yet over, the next two hours should determine the winners.
9:00 p.m. (EST) — The remaining polls close in Michigan, Kansas, South Dakota, and Texas. Additionally, the polls close in Arizona, Colorado, Louisiana, Minnesota, Nebraska, New Mexico, New York, Wisconsin, and Wyoming. Colorado and Wisconsin are the last of the “at risk” states that are part of Secretary Clinton’s easiest path to 270. Arizona and Nebraska 2 join Georgia, North Carolina, Ohio, and Maine 2 in the batch of electoral votes that Trump absolutely needs to get to 270.
Credential Challenges
In most election cycles, the credential committee of the two national convention are hardly mentioned if at all. Any credential fight is about a handful individuals who failed to win a delegate slot challenging those who did get elected to those slots. Because the nominee is a foregone conclusion, who actually fills the seat does not “matter” to the central business of the convention and any of these disputes are handled with the only media concerned about the result being the local papers from the delegate’s home town.
This year, with the Republican race looking close, there is at least a lot of noise about challenges to the delegate selection process. While it is possible that some of these complaints will end up before the two credential committees, my take is that most of the current “potential” challenges will go nowhere or are not really credentials issues. So far, it seems like there is one potential real credentials issue for the two conventions.
Posted in Cleveland, Delegates, Donald Trump, Philadelphia, PHLDNC2016
Also tagged Credentials Committee, Donald Trump, South Carolina, Virgin Islands
1 Comment
Delegate Math — Week of February 15
This week is a weird week in the presidential primary process. For almost all primary states, both parties hold their primaries on the same date because the date is set by the state legislature. Even in caucus states, there is a tendency that both parties will choose the same date. In South Carolina, however, the parties choose the primary date for their party. So this week, the Republicans have their primary in South Carolina, and the Democrats have their caucus in Nevada. Next week, the two parties will flip with the Republicans going in Nevada, and the Democrats going in South Carolina.
On the Republican side, the four states in the pre-March 1 window are exempt from the proportionality rule. South Carolina has chosen to go with a winner-take-most system. The candidate who finishes first in each of the seven congressional district will win the three delegates for that district. The candidate who finishes first state-wide gets the twenty-six at-large delegates and the three automatic delegates. At least according to the polls, Trump seems to be safely in the lead for the twenty-nine state-wide candidates. If one of the establishment candidates has a chance at winning one of the congressional districts, it is most likely to be the 1st district or the 6th district. Ted Cruz’s best chance of winning a congressional district will be the 3rd, 4th, and 5th districts.
On the Democratic side, Nevada has some weird rules. State law designates how many delegates each precinct gets to the county convention and how many delegates each county gets to the congressional and state district conventions. The counties get one delegate to the state convention for each 150 registered democrats in the county. The formula for the precinct is more complicated. In counties with fewer than 400 democrats, each precinct gets 1 delegate to the county convention for each 5 registered democrats. This ratio gradually changes so that in the largest counties (those with more than 4,000 democrats), each precinct gets 1 delegate to the county convention for each 50 registered democrats. Because this formula simply makes the county conventions larger and does not alter representation at the conventions that actually choose delegates, it should not have an actual impact on who gets Nevada’s delegates to the national convention. While Nevada will report raw vote totals, the key in Nevada (as in Iowa and other caucus states) is figuring out how many delegates each campaign will have at each of the county conventions and what that means for delegates at the state convention where delegates will actually be allocated.
At the state convention (in May), the delegates will first meet by congressional district to allocate the congressional district delegates. Three of the four district will have six delegates to the national convention. For those three districts, it will take 58.4% of the vote to get four delegates, otherwise it will be a 3-3 split. The remaining district (the 1st — Las Vegas) has five delegates. Whomever wins that district will probably get three delegates to two delegates for the runner up (it would take 70% of the vote to get to four delegates). The convention as a whole will also allocate five pledged party leaders (thus the same formula as for the 1st district) and seven at-large delegates (a four-three split unless the winning candidate gets to 65%). In short, winning the 1st and state-wide will probably result in a 19-16 delegate advantage. The only recent polls — from an unknown Republican pollster — suggests a close race.
Posted in Bernie Sanders, Delegates, Elections, GOP, Hillary Clinton, Primary and Caucus Results
Also tagged Donald Trump, South Carolina, Ted Cruz
Comments Off on Delegate Math — Week of February 15